What makes the luminous star known as Object X look so dim?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


One might think that it would be hard to hide a star some 500,000 times more radiant than the sun, but distance and dust seem to have conspired to do just that.

A group of astronomers has identified such a star in the Triangulum Galaxy, a neighbor to our own Milky Way Galaxy about three million light-years away. The star is barely detectable in visible light, but it shines brightly in the mid-infrared bands accessible to NASA's Spitzer Space Telescope. In fact, it is the brightest mid-infrared object in the entire galaxy, a fact that seems to have escaped notice until researchers from Ohio State University and the National Observatory of Athens in Greece went digging through the Spitzer data. The team weighs in on what would cause a star to look so strange in a study in the May 1 issue of The Astrophysical Journal.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The star, to which they have attached the alluring name Object X, may be an aging, massive star that has shrouded itself in dust; a star at least 30 times as massive as the sun would fit the bill. The dust around it would absorb almost all of the optical light and reradiate it as longer-wavelength infrared light. Aging stars are known to create such cloaks by ejecting material into their surroundings, sometimes throwing off several suns' worth of matter at speeds in the hundreds of kilometers per second.

But the eruption is just a phase, and a brief one at that. The few known objects that astronomers have to compare to Object X—in particular, a hypergiant star in the Milky Way and one in Triangulum—have evolved on very short timescales, changing in brightness before astronomers' very eyes. Looking back at archived astronomical images, the researchers found that Object X has been obscured since at least 1949, and it could be due for an unveiling very soon—in a matter of decades. If that occurs, astronomers will get a rare glimpse into "a brief yet eventful evolutionary state," as the study's authors put it, and emerge with a better idea of how these massive stars age.

Astronomers of the much more distant future may get an even closer look in a few billion years, if humankind is still around to see it. In less than five billion years, as the sun is nearing the end of its life, our Milky Way Galaxy is expected to merge with the nearby Andromeda Galaxy, which may by that time have devoured Triangulum, including what remains of the mysterious Object X.

Telescopic photo of Triangulum: NOAO/AURA/NSF/T. A. Rector

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe