What Makes Them Go Boom? Our Favorite Explainers on the Science of Fireworks

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Staring up as cascades of colorful light bloom noisily from the dark sky—that's how many Americans will conclude their Independence Day. Behind the pretty image, however, fireworks rely on basic physical and chemical principles. So just how do fireworks work? Various corners of the internet, including this website, have tackled the topic before.

In 2003, Scientific American published "What are the physical and chemical changes that occur in fireworks?", an Ask the Experts feature by University of Missouri at Rolla professor Paul Nicholas Worsey.

The most common type of display firework is the aerial shell, which is fired from a mortar tube. These fireworks typically have four components: a lift charge, a time-delay fuse, a breaking charge and a light/effect generator. The lift charge is generally black powder, a compound that burns rapidly and propels the shell from its tube. The lift charge also ignites the delay fuse when it fires. The delay fuse is usually a black powder fuse with a delay of a few seconds, and it is designed to ignite the break charge when the shell reaches the appropriate height. The purpose of the break charge, which sits at the center of the lofted shell, is to explode, thereby igniting and scattering the shell's contents. This break charge is generally finer-grained black powder than the lift charge and more highly confined, which causes the shell to explode. The payload of the shell usually comprises small spherical pellets of pyrotechnic composition designed to generate light.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Lighting the lift charge sends the aerial shell rocketing into the air and triggers the time-delay fuse, which ignites the break charge so the shell explodes in midair, shooting the payload of light-generating pellets, sometimes called star pellets, out in a pattern. For example, to create a five-pointed star, the pellets are arranged in a star pattern within the shell.

Prefer a visual guide? PBS's NOVA has the page Anatomy of a Firework, where depictions of aerial shells' innards accompany discussions of their composition, in addition to NOVA's listing of other fireworks resources available both on and offline.

NOVA's discussion includes multi-break shells, which include several different sections that explode in a sequence. Multi-break fireworks even get a visual guide at HowStuffWorks.com. In another visual, Marshall Brain provides a quick-and-dirty explanation of the makeup of aerial shells in the video How Fireworks Work.

For more details on how star pellets' chemical composition creates explosions of color, try the fireworks page on the "Science is Fun" website of Bassam Z. Shakhashiri, a University of Wisconsin - Madison professor of chemistry.

The colors are produced by heating metal salts, such as calcium chloride or sodium nitrate, that emit characteristic colors. The atoms of each element absorb energy and release it as light of specific colors. The energy absorbed by an atom rearranges its electrons from their lowest-energy state, called the ground state, up to a higher-energy state, called an excited state. The excess energy of the excited state is emitted as light, as the electrons descend to lower-energy states, and ultimately, the ground state. The amount of energy emitted is characteristic of the element, and the amount of energy determines the color of the light emitted. For example, when sodium nitrate is heated, the electrons of the sodium atoms absorb heat energy and become excited. This high-energy excited state does not last for long, and the excited electrons of the sodium atom quickly release their energy, about 200 kJ/mol, which is the energy of yellow light.

Science blogger and San Jose State University professor of philosophy Janet D. Stemwedel discusses the chemicals behind each color, elaborating on a Chemical and Engineering News article by Elizabeth Wilson, "What's That Stuff? Fireworks."

For a visual aid, check out the American Chemical Society (ACS) video in which John Conkling, a Washington College adjunct professor of chemistry, discusses the various chemicals that go into fireworks to create explosions and flashes of color.

But blowing up chemicals has an environmentally negative side-effect, as Scientific American online reporter Katharine Harmon discussed in a 2009 blog post, "Bombs bursting in air: What's in those Fourth of July fireworks, anyway?"

Waterways, often selected as launching sites to help decrease fire risk, show a spike in perchlorates (up from .08 to 44.2 micrograms per liter) after Fourth of July, a 2007 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) study found. Perchlorates, which are used to help the fireworks’ fuel burn, were named in an EPA health advisory earlier this year (which recommended a maximum of 15 micrograms per liter of drinking water), as they have been linked to disruption of the thyroid gland.

On top of perchlorates, some of the color-creating chemicals in fireworks can harm health. Alternative chemicals, however, may save the day. For example, in an April article in Nature, "Cleaner, greener fireworks," James Mitchell Crow reported that boron carbide may be a viable, environmentally friendlier replacement for barium-based compounds, used to make green light.

Bonus: The ACS has made other "Chemistry of" features, including last year's Fourth of July special, The Chemistry of Barbecue.

Sophie Bushwick was formerly the technology editor at Scientific American. She makes frequent appearances on radio shows such as Science Friday and television networks, including CBS, MSNBC and National Geographic. She has more than a decade of experience as a science journalist based in New York City and previously worked at outlets such as Popular Science,Discover and Gizmodo. Follow Bushwick on X (formerly Twitter) @sophiebushwick

More by Sophie Bushwick

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe