How Does That Crazy Camouflage Octopus Disappear? [Video]

The vanishing octopus is back. This stunning cephalopod, caught on video by Roger Hanlon, a senior scientist at the Woods Hole Marine Biological Laboratory, has been making the rounds online again.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


The vanishing octopus is back. This stunning cephalopod, caught on video by Roger Hanlon, a senior scientist at the Woods Hole Marine Biological Laboratory, has been making the rounds online again. The spectacular camouflaging act, made popular by ocean explorer David Gallo's 2007 TED Talk, captures some of the octopus's most impressive transformations.

In the video, a startled common octopus (Octopus vulgaris) goes from perfect disguise on a plant, to a bright white inking projectile and finally to a large mottled pancake on the seafloor. "It was a eureka moment, there's no doubt about it," Hanlon told NPR's Science Friday. And that is quite a statement for someone who has been studying these animals—and their vanishing skills—for decades.

Although rare on film, this behavior is a quintessential feature of the octopus's defense strategy. Possessing no hard shell, claws or even teeth, the slinky invertebrate must rely on other tactics to keep from getting eaten. And it has taken camouflage to the extreme.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The octopus's camouflage is created by a trio of specialized mechanisms in their skin. The first and most well known are the chromatophores, small sacs of different colored pigment that can expand or contract changing the animal's overall hue and pattern. Augmenting that are irridophores, which can reflect light and also lend coloring to the display, and leucophores, white cells that provide a crisp background. And on top of all of that, muscles under the octopus's skin can create textures to match its environment, hence the ripply appearance at the start of the video.

There is just one hitch in our understanding of this capability: we don't know if these animals can perceive color. Lab research suggests their eyes are colorblind. Try camouflaging against a crazy coral reef when all the whites, yellows, pinks and greens are just varying shades of gray.

Hanlon and his colleagues are searching for other ways they might be able to pick up on their environment to inform their full-color camouflage. One possibility? That they can see with their skin.

Illustration courtesy of Ivan Phillipsen

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe