Weird Biology Fact of the Day: Mirror-image Amino Acids

In her fascinating and wide-ranging talk on multi-dimensional spaces and human consciousness, Tauba Auerbach briefly mentioned the fact that after an organism dies its molecules will gradually change "handedness" — from an entropy defying left-handed favoritism back to 50-50 over many thousands of years.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


I learned many interesting things at this weekend's MIT Center For Art, Science & Technology Symposium, but there is one fact that totally blew my mind. In her fascinating and wide-ranging talk on multi-dimensional space and human consciousness, Tauba Auerbach briefly mentioned the fact that after an organism dies its amino acids will gradually change "handedness" — from an entropy defying left-handed favoritism back to 50-50 over many thousands of years.

Non-biological amino acids produced in organic chemistry labs come in equal mixtures of their mirror-image flavors. In living cells, however, amino acids are almost entirely left handed, with only a few exceptions. All new protein chains made by a living cell will be have 100% left-handed amino acids, but over time a tiny percentage will randomly flip to being right handed. Proteins that aren't frequently recycled in the body will accumulate these flipped amino acids over the course of a lifetime. Using an estimate of around one flip per thousand amino acids per year, researchers have been able to guess the age of humans by looking at the handedness of the amino acids in their tooth enamel, or the age of whales by the amino acids in the lenses of their eyes.

Dating organisms that have been dead for a long time using the handedness of amino acids is trickier because the rate of random flipping depends on the temperature (in a warm blooded animal like a human or whale, the temperature is stable enough over time to give a pretty good estimate while it's still alive). In places with a similar "thermal history," amino acid dating can be used to determine the relative ages of organisms over much longer time-scales.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Astrobiologists think about the handedness of amino acids a lot too. The fact that all living things on Earth use the left handed version leads to many intriguing questions: Is there a "shadow biosphere" of right-handed organisms that we haven't been able to detect? Does the slightly higher proportion of left-handed amino acids found in meteorites indicate the existence of extraterrestrial life? How did life "choose" the left-handed version?

Christina Agapakis is a biologist, designer, and writer with an ecological and evolutionary approach to synthetic biology and biological engineering. Her PhD thesis projects at the Harvard Medical School include design of metabolic pathways in bacteria for hydrogen fuel production, personalized genetic engineering of plants, engineered photosynthetic endosymbiosis, and cheese smell-omics. With Oscillator and Icosahedron Labs she works towards envisioning the future of biological technologies and synthetic biology design.

More by Christina Agapakis

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe