4 Cars Complete Race without a Human Driver

Earlier this month, four self-driving cars raced a 3.2-kilometer (two-mile) track in Northern California

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Earlier this month, a group of nine self-driving cars raced a 3.2 kilometer (2 mile) track in Northern California. Four of the nine completed the course without human help. In first place was “Point One” with a time of 3 minutes and 37.9 seconds.

The competitors included students and entrepreneurs from small start-up companies who wanted to test their technologies in this large-scale laboratory. While they did time each “race”, according to Jack Loughran in his article in this month's E&T magazine “the real goal was just to make it around the track rather than to win.”

The cars raced at the Thunderhill West race course, located north of San Francisco in Willows, California off the I-5. They raced one at a time and had a human driver onboard in case they needed to intervene.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Some of the cars used GPS and other location tracking to follow digital maps to steer around the course. This was the case for the unofficial winner “Point One”. Other cars were taught how to drive “on the fly” by artificial intelligence systems, including a car owned by a software company called PolySync. While these cars had some success, they often needed a human driver to take the wheel in order to keep them on the road.  

One self-driving car enthusiast spoke with the Point One and PolySync teams at this month’s race, posting his video online (see 1:01 for the Point One and 1:38 for the PolySync car).
 

 

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe