4 Cars Complete Race without a Human Driver

Earlier this month, four self-driving cars raced a 3.2-kilometer (two-mile) track in Northern California

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Earlier this month, a group of nine self-driving cars raced a 3.2 kilometer (2 mile) track in Northern California. Four of the nine completed the course without human help. In first place was “Point One” with a time of 3 minutes and 37.9 seconds.

The competitors included students and entrepreneurs from small start-up companies who wanted to test their technologies in this large-scale laboratory. While they did time each “race”, according to Jack Loughran in his article in this month's E&T magazine “the real goal was just to make it around the track rather than to win.”

The cars raced at the Thunderhill West race course, located north of San Francisco in Willows, California off the I-5. They raced one at a time and had a human driver onboard in case they needed to intervene.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Some of the cars used GPS and other location tracking to follow digital maps to steer around the course. This was the case for the unofficial winner “Point One”. Other cars were taught how to drive “on the fly” by artificial intelligence systems, including a car owned by a software company called PolySync. While these cars had some success, they often needed a human driver to take the wheel in order to keep them on the road.  

One self-driving car enthusiast spoke with the Point One and PolySync teams at this month’s race, posting his video online (see 1:01 for the Point One and 1:38 for the PolySync car).
 

 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe