A One–Two Punch to Tackle China's Air Pollution Problems

New research shows how climate and air quality policies can work together to clean up China's air

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Air pollution kills an estimated 4,000 people every day in China, which is why the country is taking significant measures to clean up the air. At the same time, China has pledged to support global efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. A new study published in the journal “Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment” estimates how effectively these two efforts can work together to tackle China’s air pollution problems.

Most of China’s air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions are currently produced by its energy and industrial sectors, which are dominated by coal use. However, as private vehicle ownership and freight traffic has increased, so has the pollution from the transportation sector.

In turn, the researchers behind this new study looked at the combination of both putting a price on carbon (CO2) emissions and implementing the country's existing emissions standards for vehicles. According to MIT’s Paul Natsuo Kishimoto, who was the lead author on this new study that included researchers from MIT, Tsinghua University and Emory University:


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In any province, transportation produces at most a quarter of all emissions that cause air pollution in China...Improving fuel economy and emissions control technology on new vehicles and replacing old cars, trucks, and buses would sharply reduce the transportation sector’s share of the problem — but have no effect on the rest of the country’s air pollution emissions. On the other hand, a climate policy would impact not only that transport share but everything else. An economy-wide carbon price would help reduce carbon emissions throughout the country, but especially in non-transportation sectors where it’s far less expensive to cut emissions. Both approaches are necessary and complimentary.”

Using an energy-economic model, Kishimoto’s team found that the combination of both vehicle emission standards and an economy-wide carbon price can work together to “form a highly effective coordinated policy package that supports China’s air quality and climate change mitigation goals.”

In other words, China’s combination of climate policies and vehicle emission standards could pack a strong “one-two punch”.

To learn more – one can access the entire research paper here and MIT’s recent press release here.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe