A One–Two Punch to Tackle China's Air Pollution Problems

New research shows how climate and air quality policies can work together to clean up China's air

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Air pollution kills an estimated 4,000 people every day in China, which is why the country is taking significant measures to clean up the air. At the same time, China has pledged to support global efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. A new study published in the journal “Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment” estimates how effectively these two efforts can work together to tackle China’s air pollution problems.

Most of China’s air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions are currently produced by its energy and industrial sectors, which are dominated by coal use. However, as private vehicle ownership and freight traffic has increased, so has the pollution from the transportation sector.

In turn, the researchers behind this new study looked at the combination of both putting a price on carbon (CO2) emissions and implementing the country's existing emissions standards for vehicles. According to MIT’s Paul Natsuo Kishimoto, who was the lead author on this new study that included researchers from MIT, Tsinghua University and Emory University:


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In any province, transportation produces at most a quarter of all emissions that cause air pollution in China...Improving fuel economy and emissions control technology on new vehicles and replacing old cars, trucks, and buses would sharply reduce the transportation sector’s share of the problem — but have no effect on the rest of the country’s air pollution emissions. On the other hand, a climate policy would impact not only that transport share but everything else. An economy-wide carbon price would help reduce carbon emissions throughout the country, but especially in non-transportation sectors where it’s far less expensive to cut emissions. Both approaches are necessary and complimentary.”

Using an energy-economic model, Kishimoto’s team found that the combination of both vehicle emission standards and an economy-wide carbon price can work together to “form a highly effective coordinated policy package that supports China’s air quality and climate change mitigation goals.”

In other words, China’s combination of climate policies and vehicle emission standards could pack a strong “one-two punch”.

To learn more – one can access the entire research paper here and MIT’s recent press release here.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe