Coal at a 150-year low in the United Kingdom

In 2015, coal use hit a 150-year low in the United Kingdom and led to a 4% drop in carbon emissions according to government energy statistics.

Photo of the Union Jack Flag by Vaughn Leiberum (CC2.0)

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Carbon dioxide emissions in the United Kingdom fell by 4% in 2015 due to dropping production and consumption of coal, according to U.K. Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC). All told, coal consumption fell by 22% between 2014 and 2015 across the nation.

The U.K. is working to close all of its coal power plants in order to meet its goal of eliminating all carbon dioxide emissions from the electricity sector by 2025. Four coal plants were closed in the first quarter of 2016 alone, leaving six remaining coal plants in operation.

Among these Q1 2016 closures was Scotland’s last remaining coal power plant – the Longanett Power Station in Fife, north of Edinburgh had been in operation since 1968. At 3pm on March 24 this 2.4 Gigawatt (GW) power station was powered down for the last time, leaving Scotland coal-free for the first time in more than a century.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe