Coal at a 150-year low in the United Kingdom

In 2015, coal use hit a 150-year low in the United Kingdom and led to a 4% drop in carbon emissions according to government energy statistics.

Photo of the Union Jack Flag by Vaughn Leiberum (CC2.0)

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Carbon dioxide emissions in the United Kingdom fell by 4% in 2015 due to dropping production and consumption of coal, according to U.K. Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC). All told, coal consumption fell by 22% between 2014 and 2015 across the nation.

The U.K. is working to close all of its coal power plants in order to meet its goal of eliminating all carbon dioxide emissions from the electricity sector by 2025. Four coal plants were closed in the first quarter of 2016 alone, leaving six remaining coal plants in operation.

Among these Q1 2016 closures was Scotland’s last remaining coal power plant – the Longanett Power Station in Fife, north of Edinburgh had been in operation since 1968. At 3pm on March 24 this 2.4 Gigawatt (GW) power station was powered down for the last time, leaving Scotland coal-free for the first time in more than a century.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


 

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe