Do You Think it's Possible for the U.S. to Become the World's Leading Producer of Oil and Gas?

It's not just possible, it's happening... The United States is already overtaking Russia to become the largest oil and gas producer in the world.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


It’s not just possible, it’s happening… The United States is already overtaking Russia to become the largest oil and gas producer in the world.

This question appeared on the latest UT Energy Poll to take the pulse of energy literacy in the U.S. Previous waves reported that most Americans don’t seem to know where we get our oil or what hydraulic fracturing means so asking about domestic oil and gas production provides a way to find out who is paying attention to the energy transition currently underway.

Results reveal that just 16 percent of Americans know that the United States “has already been the world’s leading producer of oil and natural gas.” Fifty percent think it is possible (this may include some who are aware it's taking place) while over one-third (34 percent) say it’s not possible.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Libertarians are most likely to know that oil and gas production is up, while Democrats and Independents are least likely say it's possible for the U.S. to become the leading oil and gas producer. Republicans are more likely than other groups to say it's possible, but no more likely to respond that this is already taking place.

Why does it matter whether Americans are following energy issues? Because our attitudes influence how we vote, and eventually shape future policy decisions. The UT Energy Poll continues to provide insight into voting behavior and our global energy priorities, but another key finding is that energy literacy across the U.S. is low.

Sheril Kirshenbaum is executive director of Science Debate, a nonpartisan org working to get presidential candidates on record on science policy. She co-directs Michigan State University's Food Literacy and Engagement Poll and hosts the NPR podcast Serving Up Science.

More by Sheril Kirshenbaum

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe