Buildings are sexy, too

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


In terms of basic human needs, shelter comes in right after food, air, and sleep. Over years of human development, buildings have become some of mankind’s greatest achievements. A look at the skyline of any major city showcases centuries of technological advancements and creativity. Yet, the impacts of buildings on the environment and our resources are rarely at the forefront of the energy policy dialogue.

We tend to focus on the sources of energy like wind turbines or nuclear power plants when discussing our energy sources. At the end use side of the equation, we look to light bulbs and cars. Buildings? They aren't exactly sexy.

Consider this: according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, our nation’s buildings consume over 40 percent of the energy consumed across all sectors - that is even more energy than consumed by the transportation sector (29 percent). And in our homes and apartments, nearly half (49 percent) of all energy is used for heating and cooling.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Buildings consume energy in a number of ways: lighting, heating, cooling, appliances, etc. These are all very important, but in light of the record temperatures sweeping the country, we'll start by looking at heating and cooling in homes. The U.S. Department of Energy and Environmental Protection Agencies have put together a handy graphic showing the common areas where a home loses its heating and cooling energy.

Some of the areas are no brainers, like around doors and windows, but some are not as common, like openings in the attic for ductwork, or under your kitchen sink. Also notice that a home loses energy not just by losing cool air to outside, but also taking in cold air during the winter.

Depending on the home, a significant portion of energy used for heating and cooling is wasted. The reason is that over time, a house or apartment settles and develops leaks here and there; insulation is trampled down, and appliances get dirty and become less efficient through normal wear and tear. You can think of a building as a complex machine with a lot of moving parts, and over time, things start to wear out and performance decreases. So just like a car, bicycle, or airplane, a house can use a tune up every now and then to get it performing at its optimum level.

In my own home, I am surprised to see light framing the doors, meaning air has no problem seeping through. The house was remodeled just a few years ago with energy efficient appliances, materials, and weatherstripping, so I had little reason to suspect our home was losing energy. In a cruel turn of events, the hot and dry weather have dried out the clay soil under the house, leaving the foundation to sink and causing the all sorts of openings in our house. You can (literally) see the kilowatt-hours slipping away.

So how do you know if your home needs a tune up? Sometimes it’s obvious (like my house), and sometimes not so much. The first step would be to perform an energy audit - that is, assessing the current condition of your home to see if there are areas where air is leaking in or out of the house, if insulation has been trampled down, or the original air conditioning unit can be swapped out for a modern, more efficient model. The quality and detail of energy audits can very widely. If you’re looking for a quick, non-intrusive first glance at your home’s performance, you can check out online energy audit tools. A quick Google search pulls up Energy Savvy and the Department of Energy’s Home Energy Tool.

For these online tools, you enter information about the characteristics of your home: year it was built, if it has single- or double-paned windows, type and condition of your A/C system and water heater, and so on. These online tools excel at giving you an idea of how your home is performing from the comfort of your computer.

However, having an in-person energy audit will provide the most amount of detail. Typically, an energy auditor will perform a walk through of your home and visually inspect around doors and windows, measure insulation levels in the attic, and ask about any comfort issues or other problems you are experiencing. It’s a good idea to have air infiltration tests like a blower door or duct blaster performed to identify any hard to reach leaks. From my experience, energy auditors have also found things that a computer program can’t, like ventilation ducts that aren’t hooked up to rooms in a house.

While the general public might not think about building efficiency all that much, governments have recognized the impact of buildings and their occupants and have launched programs to encourage energy efficiency. The U.S. Department of Energy and Environmental Protection Agency administer programs like Home Performance with Energy Star and the Better Buildings initiative that encourage whole house energy retrofits. Many state and local governments help low income residents weatherize homes to save money and energy, while utilities are recognizing the cost effectiveness of building efficiency.

By making modest improvements in heating and cooling efficiency, we can relieve stress on electric grids while possibly saving some dinero. Leaky ducts and walls are just the tip of the building efficiency iceberg, though. There is a whole world of light bulbs, appliances, smart homes, water heaters, and more to discuss. In the meantime, stay cool!

David Wogan is an engineer and policy researcher who writes about energy, technology, and policy.

David's academic and professional background includes a unique blend of technology and policy in the field of energy systems. Most recently, David worked at Austin Energy, a Texas municipal utility, implementing a Department of Energy stimulus grant related to energy efficiency. Previously, David was a member of the Energy & Climate Change team at the White House Council on Environmental Quality for the Obama Administration.

David holds two Master's degrees from The University of Texas at Austin in Mechanical Engineering and Public Affairs. While at UT, David was a researcher in the Webber Energy Group, where his research focused on advanced biofuel production to offset petroleum use in the transportation sector. David holds a Bachelor's of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering from The University of Texas at Austin, where he researched nuclear non-proliferation measurement technology.

David is a 2013 Aspen Institute Journalism Scholar, joining a select group of journalists from Slate, ABC News, and The New York Times.

David lives in Austin, Texas. Follow along on Twitter or email him at david.wogan@me.com.

More by David Wogan

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe