New Poll Reveals Science and Technology Will Be Important to Voters--across Parties--in the Upcoming Presidential Election

A new poll reveals that voters will be paying close attention to science and technology policy priorities of candidates leading up to the 2016 presidential election.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Regular readers know that I often write about the intersection of energy and politics, especially when we're gearing up for an election.

Historically, science and technology issues were often treated as a special interest or altogether ignored in politics. However, times have changed. A new nationally representative poll out today commissioned by Research!America and ScienceDebate* suggests that Americans want to hear more about research, innovation and global leadership from candidates. For example, the vast majority of Americans (86%) agree with the statement:


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


 

In fact, 87% say it's important that candidates for President and Congress have a basic understanding of the science informing public policy issues. And this isn't a partisan sentiment, but a priority across parties:

Make sure to read more from the full survey and scroll through some of the findings.

The results of this poll reveal that Americans are keenly interested in the science and technology policy priorities of candidates running for office. And personally, I hope they address a myriad of related topics shaping how we live over the coming decades.

Regardless, what all of us--and presidential hopefuls--can be sure of is that when it comes to science policy in the next election, voters are certainly paying attention.

* Full disclosure: I serve as executive director of ScienceDebate.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe