Race and the Politics of Climate Change in Two Charts

At WashPo’s Wonk Blog, Chris Mooney and Peyton Craighill are wondering why black and Latino Americans support climate action more than whites.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


At WashPo's Wonk Blog, Chris Mooney and Peyton Craighill are wondering why black and Latino Americans support climate action more than whites. They cite a Spring 2014 Washington Post/ABC News poll reporting that Hispanics and African Americans were more likely than U.S. whites to say climate change is a very serious problem confronting the country.

Surprised? I'm not. Here's a look at UT Energy Poll data collected over three years:

[Click to view larger]


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Chris and Peyton suggest these differences might be an example of the "white male" effect, "in which white males have been found to be generally less concerned about a number of environmental and other types of risks." They add that Hispanic Americans may have "greater awareness of how people think and how they grapple with environmental issues in other parts of the world."

Both may be true, but I suspect partisan politics may be driving attitudes in the U.S. as well. Democrats are far more likely to think that climate change is occurring--and African Americans and Hispanics are more likely to belong to the Democratic party.

[Click to view larger]

Of course, it's also possible that African Americans and Hispanics are driving the differences we see among political parties. What do you think?

Sheril Kirshenbaum is executive director of Science Debate, a nonpartisan org working to get presidential candidates on record on science policy. She co-directs Michigan State University's Food Literacy and Engagement Poll and hosts the NPR podcast Serving Up Science.

More by Sheril Kirshenbaum

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe