Report: Solar PV Costs Continue to Fall in 2016

According to a new report from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, solar costs continued to drop in 2016.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Utility-scale solar photovoltaic (PV) system costs dropped by 20 percent in the first quarter of 2016, according to a report by the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). Residential and commercial solar also dropped – by 6 and 4 percent, respectively.

According to NREL Senior Analyst and Project Lead, Ran Fu:

"The continuing total cost decline of solar PV systems demonstrates the sustained economic competitiveness of solar PV for the industry across all three sectors”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


These new results also highlight the significant role of soft costs (i.e. non-hardware costs such as labor, overhead, permitting, financing) in the solar cost equation. According to this new report from NREL, soft costs represented:

  • 58% of residential solar PV system costs

  • 49% of commercial solar PV system costs

  • 34% of utility-scale solar PV system costs

The figure below shows the price per Watt of installed solar capacity from the fourth quarter of 2009 through the first quarter of 2016. All told, the cost of solar has dropped by more than 50 percent across all sectors.

 

 

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe