Report: This Winter Is Challenging Energy Security in France

A series of nuclear power station shutdowns and low hydro reservoirs in France are highlighting energy security concerns this winter

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


France is facing a series of challenges this year with its electricity supply according to a recently published report from the International Energy Agency titled “Energy Policies of IEA Countries: France 2016 Review.”

According to the recent IEA report, a series of nuclear power station shutdowns for maintenance this winter took 9 Gigawatts (GW) of nuclear power off the grid in France. This capacity represents approximately 15% of France’s total nuclear capacity, bringing about concerns regarding that country’s ability to meet customer demand. At the same time, reservoirs for France’s hydroelectricity facilities are at their lowest levels in ten years.

Nuclear power currently supplies the majority (about 75%) of electricity generation in France. Conventional generation, including gas, coal and oil, make up about 6% of total generation. The balance is supplied using renewables, the majority of which comes from hydroelectric power.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Electricity supplies have been sufficient (so far) this winter. However, the IEA cautions that efforts will need to be made to ensure that the aging nuclear fleet and shifting power supply in the country will not threaten France’s energy security.

This report by the IEA if available to read (for free) here.

 

 

 

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe