Scientists Develop a "Better Way" to Produce Renewable Hydrogen

Scientists at the Department of Energy's National Renewable Energy Laboratory have developed a “better way” to make hydrogen using renewable energy, according to a paper published this month in Nature Energy

John Turner is a research fellow at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, where he has worked since 1979. 

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Scientists at the U.S. Department of Energy's National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) have developed a “better way” to make hydrogen using renewable energy according to a paper published this month in Nature Energy.

Hydrogen has many potential applications and is already used to upgrade crude oil for fuel production and in the synthesis of ammonia (which is critical in food production). Today, this hydrogen is commonly produced using steam reformation processes that rely on natural gas. But, scientists have been working on ways to swap out this fossil fuel for renewable energy sources.

One such method includes the use of photoelectrochemical (PEC) devices that can absorb sunlight and use it directly to split water molecules. Broadly speaking, these devices can convert the energy in sunlight into hydrogen and oxygen without the need for natural gas and at potentially higher efficiencies than electrolysis.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


These PEC devices have significant promise but scientists have struggled to produce a design that is durable enough to become commercially viable. However, according to the new paper, researchers have made a significant stride in improving the durability of PEC devices, bringing them one step closer to commercialization.

Their new method is based on research produced 18 years ago by John Turner, a research fellow at NREL who has been with the labs since 1979. In his earlier work, Turner designed a tandem solar cell comprised of several layers of gallium indium phosphide (GaInP2) and gallium arsenide (GaAs) semiconductors. These layers absorb sunlight and produce enough power to split water molecules into hydrogen and oxygen.

Turner’s device held the record for the highest solar-to-hydrogen conversion efficiency until 2015. But, despite this high efficiency the device struggled to make sense commercially as it degraded quickly.

In their new design, researchers have improved on Turner’s design by inserting a protective layer – comprised of titanium dioxide (TiO2) and molybdenum sulfide (MoSx) – to defend the GaInP2 layers from the negative effects of the acidic solution to which they are exposed. In turn, they have been able to increase the longevity of this PEC device.

This research effort was led by Jing Gu, a postdoc researcher who worked with John Turner before becoming an assistant professor at San Diego State University. The other co-authors are all based at NREL and include (in addition to Turner) Jing Gu, Jeffery A. Aguiar, Suzanne Ferrere, Xerxes Steirer, Yong Yan, Chuanxiao Xiao, James L. Young, Mowafak Al-Jassim, and Nathan R. Neale.

Reference: Gu, J., Aguiar, J. A., Ferrere, S., Steirer, K. X., Yan, Y., Xiao, C., Young, J. L., Al-Jassim, M., Neale, N. R. and Turner, J. A. (2017) ‘A graded catalytic–protective layer for an efficient and stable water-splitting photocathode’, Nature Energy. Nature Publishing Group, 2, p. 16192. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2016.192.

 

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe