The End of Coal and What it Means for Transport, Part 1

Steep Drop in Coal Has Potential to Reshape American Trains

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


While much has been made of “peak coal” (U.S. coal use dropped 29% in 2015) and especially with the world’s largest coal producer (Peabody Energy) filing for bankruptcy, the shift may be apparent in the energy system (from coal to natural gas and renewable energy), but what are the effects for the transport system?

Whereas passenger travel dominates train traffic in Europe, in the U.S. it is freight, and more specifically, coal. In fact, an impressive 38.8% of rail tonnage is coal. According to the Center for Climate and Energy Solutions, “Coal is the good moved second most by weight and the good moved the most by ton-miles, and more than 70 percent of coal is moved by rail.”

Yet, as coal usage in the U.S. power sector declines, so will the number of trains needed to transport it, which is a lot of trains, often going back empty once the coal has been delivered. In February, coal train traffic went down 30%, and trains carrying petroleum and related products saw a 16.8% drop.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


This has some unexplored implications. First off, what are the consequences for Amtrak and passenger trains in general? Will this be the shift needed for passenger trains to regain some priority over the all-mighty freight train, or will the U.S. double-down on freight trains but with different goods?

With coal transport on the decline, will freight trains make way for passenger traffic? Image credit: PhotoDisc/Getty Images.

Second, as tracks do not take up much space per se, there are probably not huge space savings to be gained (compared to, say, highways suddenly going defunct) – but what about energy and emissions savings? For example, how much CO2 is used just by the transportation of coal, and how much could be saved?

Next month I’ll dig further into the numbers to see how the transforming energy system is changing train traffic, both short-term and long-term. For example, what business models will be needed to adapt to decreased or changing traffic? What role will the government play? What are the implications for other modes? And how will peak coal reshape the American train system?

This and more in Part 2 of this blog series, but for now, what do you foresee for trains in America? Share your thoughts below.

Tali Trigg is an energy analyst, technology policy advisor and writer. His work includes research and analysis on energy and transportation, with an emphasis on the role of cities in shaping transport energy demand and mobility solutions. His blog covers the wide range of mobility and energy, with deep-dives into numbers and maps, but is keen to cover anything transport-related and under-reported. Opinions are his own.

More by Tali Trigg

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe