The End of Coal and What it Means for Transport, Part 1

Steep Drop in Coal Has Potential to Reshape American Trains

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


While much has been made of “peak coal” (U.S. coal use dropped 29% in 2015) and especially with the world’s largest coal producer (Peabody Energy) filing for bankruptcy, the shift may be apparent in the energy system (from coal to natural gas and renewable energy), but what are the effects for the transport system?

Whereas passenger travel dominates train traffic in Europe, in the U.S. it is freight, and more specifically, coal. In fact, an impressive 38.8% of rail tonnage is coal. According to the Center for Climate and Energy Solutions, “Coal is the good moved second most by weight and the good moved the most by ton-miles, and more than 70 percent of coal is moved by rail.”

Yet, as coal usage in the U.S. power sector declines, so will the number of trains needed to transport it, which is a lot of trains, often going back empty once the coal has been delivered. In February, coal train traffic went down 30%, and trains carrying petroleum and related products saw a 16.8% drop.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


This has some unexplored implications. First off, what are the consequences for Amtrak and passenger trains in general? Will this be the shift needed for passenger trains to regain some priority over the all-mighty freight train, or will the U.S. double-down on freight trains but with different goods?

With coal transport on the decline, will freight trains make way for passenger traffic? Image credit: PhotoDisc/Getty Images.

Second, as tracks do not take up much space per se, there are probably not huge space savings to be gained (compared to, say, highways suddenly going defunct) – but what about energy and emissions savings? For example, how much CO2 is used just by the transportation of coal, and how much could be saved?

Next month I’ll dig further into the numbers to see how the transforming energy system is changing train traffic, both short-term and long-term. For example, what business models will be needed to adapt to decreased or changing traffic? What role will the government play? What are the implications for other modes? And how will peak coal reshape the American train system?

This and more in Part 2 of this blog series, but for now, what do you foresee for trains in America? Share your thoughts below.

Tali Trigg is an energy analyst, technology policy advisor and writer. His work includes research and analysis on energy and transportation, with an emphasis on the role of cities in shaping transport energy demand and mobility solutions. His blog covers the wide range of mobility and energy, with deep-dives into numbers and maps, but is keen to cover anything transport-related and under-reported. Opinions are his own.

More by Tali Trigg

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe