The Road to Paris and COP-21

As 2015 begins, the road to the crucial COP-21 summit here in Paris (where I am based) is being outlined by the French government, the UN, and a huge number of other actors and NGOs.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


As 2015 begins, the road to the crucial COP-21 summit here in Paris (where I am based) is being outlined by the French government, the UN, and a huge number of other actors and NGOs. But the first big question might be, is it crucial at all?

The 2009 UN summit in Copenhagen was famously ineffectual, and ever since hopes have been tempered by what exactly all 193 nations recognized by the UN can agree to, which is saying something.

There are those who argue that the UNFCCC negotiations are crucial to drumming up support for the fight against climate change, and there are those who see it as a major distraction from actual on-the-ground action. Wherever you fall, it is clear that much is happening on a local and regional level, not to mention in the private sector e.g. green bonds, but perhaps international climate negotiations do have a role?


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


With the EU almost reaching its 2020 climate targets several years in advance, South Korea launching the world’s second largest carbon trading market, and Indonesia cutting costly fuel subsidies, there are some good news items from 2014, but are they enough? And are national and international actions just results from a lot of hard, grass-roots work and long-term efforts? In some ways, it is proof that every bit counts, and in other ways, it also suggests how showy commitments (US and China) can ultimately become quite substantive.

The French government is pushing a positive and solutions-driven agenda for COP-21, and perhaps there is something to be said for that, especially if you account for all the existing progress on-the-ground. But are we missing the forest for the trees? Whatever the case, one thing is for sure: we can’t sit on our laurels in 2015. Time is against us with scary new milestones reached and fast rising seas.

Tali Trigg is an energy analyst, technology policy advisor and writer. His work includes research and analysis on energy and transportation, with an emphasis on the role of cities in shaping transport energy demand and mobility solutions. His blog covers the wide range of mobility and energy, with deep-dives into numbers and maps, but is keen to cover anything transport-related and under-reported. Opinions are his own.

More by Tali Trigg

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe