Tired of paying rent? Why not build your own tiny solar-powered palace?

Chris and Malissa Tack’s home in Snohomish, Washington is smaller than a studio apartment. But, its 140 square feet boasts all the modern conveniences that they need to live and work.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Chris and Malissa Tack's home in Snohomish, Washington is smaller than a studio apartment. But, its 140 square feet boasts all the modern conveniences that they need to live and work. Its 140 square feet comes complete with a sleeping loft, wine barrel shower, kitchen, and two collapsable workspaces. What it doesn't come with is extra room - Chris took seven carloads of stuff to Goodwill prior to their move from apartment to house-on-wheels.

The couple says that the house is perfect for them in their present stage in life (2 adults in their late 20s, one cat, no kids). And, their low overhead is allowing them to save money each month while also keeping a pretty roof over their heads. Prior to moving into their tiny palace, the couple paid just over $1200 per month in rent (1). Today, they pay $300 to rent a plot of land. The house itself cost $32,000 - $20k for the house and $12k for the solar array that they installed outside to provide power.

 


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The house doesn't make sense for everyone - for example, as a full-time residence for familes with many children or large pets, or folks living in areas with very high winds or frequent tornados. But, it is an interesting example of a couple re-baselining living situation requirements based on their personal needs. And, from the short video overview of this project, it looks like they had a lot of fun completing this home project together.

(1) $58,000 over 4 years --> average of $1208 per month

H/T to Upworthy for linking to this video.

Photo Credit: Photos via youtube

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe