Toronto Rolls with the Grid

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


My colleague Melissa Lott presciently today in this very space recalled the enormous India blackouts of 2012 and discussed new algorithms for addressing similar events in the future.

Cue thunder, offstage: Toronto got almost 5 inches of rain on the night of July 8, washing out its downtown to an unprecedented scale. And naturally, after a storm of that magnitude, many people went without power -- some 300,000, in fact, during the storm's worst, with 20,000 without power afterwards.

Then it became clear that with one of the Hydro One power stations providing power to the Toronto Hydro electrical grid under 20 feet of water, the power supply was, in the words of Toronto Mayor Rob Ford, "hanging by a thread." The first call was for customers to back off power demand via load-shedding -- asking customers to turn off everything they could, throttle back on air conditioning, keep the refrigerator doors shut, and so on. Most utilities now offer cost savings by asking commercial and industrial customers to willingly allow their electric utilities to manage their load by, say, allowing air conditioning thermostat settings to rise when power consumption is high to avoid overextending the grid. Many offer residential customers the same benefit. And the premise of the Smart Grid and the many home management programs already available is to load shift -- peak energy demands come around breakfast time and in early evening hours, so if you program your dishwasher and wash machine to do their jobs at 2 a.m., you do a favor for your utility and can reap economic rewards for doing it. ON the other hand, nature respects no such agreements -- when five inches of rain floods your generating station, you end up hanging by a thread so slender that Toronto Hydro had to implement the familiar third-world strategy of rolling blackouts, in which the power just goes out for certain areas, and the only benefit darkened customers get is -- hopefully -- a bit of notice.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


CBC journalist Kerry Wall was on the case, though. Before she left work, she created a Google Map of the blackout areas -- and left it updateable by readers. So Toronto readers could check whether their neighborhoods have power before they went home -- or could make other arrangements if they were.

Microgrid apologists will find in this support for the neighborhood-scale electrical systems they envision, though the idea only comforts you if it's not your neighborhood under 20 feet of water; traditional grid supporters will tout the speed with which Toronto Hydro will be able to get the entire grid back up and running. It's hard to see a storm like this supporting anybody's position except the realists'. When a great big storm comes, sometimes the lights go out.

 

Scott Huler was born in 1959 in Cleveland and raised in that city's eastern suburbs. He graduated from Washington University in 1981; he was made a member of Phi Beta Kappa because of the breadth of his studies, and that breadth has been a signature of his writing work. He has written on everything from the death penalty to bikini waxing, from NASCAR racing to the stealth bomber, for such newspapers as the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Philadelphia Inquirer, and the Los Angeles Times and such magazines as ESPN, Backpacker, and Fortune. His award-winning radio work has been heard on "All Things Considered" and "Day to Day" on National Public Radio and on "Marketplace" and "Splendid Table" on American Public Media. He has been a staff writer for the Philadelphia Daily News and the Raleigh News & Observer and a staff reporter and producer for Nashville Public Radio. He was the founding and managing editor of the Nashville City Paper. He has taught at such colleges as Berry College and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

His books include Defining the Wind, about the Beaufort Scale of wind force, and No-Man's Lands, about retracing the journey of Odysseus.

His most recent book, On the Grid, was his sixth. His work has been included in such compilations as Appalachian Adventure and in such anthologies as Literary Trails of the North Carolina Piedmont, The Appalachian Trail Reader and Speed: Stories of Survival from Behind the Wheel.

For 2014-2015 Scott is a Knight Science Journalism Fellow at MIT, which is funding his work on the Lawson Trek, an effort to retrace the journey of explorer John Lawson through the Carolinas in 1700-1701.

He lives in Raleigh, North Carolina, with his wife, the writer June Spence, and their two sons.

More by Scott Huler

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe