The Vampire (Loads) in Your House

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Tonight, children (and adults) will celebrate Halloween by flooding out into their neighborhoods to offer tricks and ask for treats from their neighbors. In preparation for this event many of these people will garb themselves in costumes, both sweet and scary. But, while you might look at the streets for monsters tomorrow night, you probably don’t need to look much further than your own living room. Residential “vampires” – devices that use standby power - are responsible for between 5 and 10 percent of residential electricity use in the United States. And, at $4 billion per year, these power consumers are (arguably) no small matter.

When you leave your home in the morning, you probably remembered to turn off your TV and grab their cell phone from its charger. But chances are that you did not unplug the TV or the charger itself from the wall, instead leaving these devices to continue to demand energy throughout the day. According to the U.S. Department of Energy standby (or “vampire”) power is responsible for 5 to 10 percent of residential electric bills in the United States, costing consumers approximately $4 billion per year.

According to some, vampire loads are too small of an energy consumer to matter much. As Cambridge University Professor David MacKay put it in his 2009 video “How Many Lightbulbs?,” standby power barely registers compared to the scale of daily household energy use (see 0:33 - 0:46 and 1:47 to 1:57 of the video below to hear Professor MacKay's thoughts on vampire loads).


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


But, others argue that this wedge of the energy consumption pie could be one of the simplest to reduce. And, according to a Green Blog post in the New York Times just before last year’s Halloween celebration, new developments in nanotechnology could revolutionize the very device that is responsible for the slow bleeding away of power – the transistor. I.B.M, in partnership with several European companies, is looking to redesign the transistors found in many of our consumer electronics.

If their plan is successful…

“…[we could have] cellphone batteries that last 10 times longer than today’s models, and computers and other devices that use virtually no power when in stand-by mode”

This would be quite an accomplishment, both from a consumer standpoint (imagine, no more mid-day cell phone charging) and from an energy efficiency point-of-view. Eliminating 5-10% of residential electricity consumption could translate into large economic savings, through not only smaller electric bills in the short-term, but also by reducing the need for new power plants in the long-term.

Photo Credit:

  1. Graphic of vampire smiley by PhilWolff and used under this Creative Commons license.

  2. Photo of plug in wall socket by Rennett Stowe and used under this Creative Commons license.

[I originally posted about IMB's work on transistor design last October on my personal blog, Global Energy Matters].

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe