Why Eating Leftovers Is Good for Energy Efficiency

There are many reasons to not let those Thanksgiving leftovers go to waste, including the energy savings

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


There are many reasons to not let those Thanksgiving leftovers go to waste, including the energy savings.

According to scientists from the University of Texas at Austin, the United States could save roughly 2 percent of its total energy consumption each year if it could significantly reduce or eliminate its food waste.

Every day, the average American household throws away a pound and a half of food and the energy embedded within this food. According to research presented by University of Texas Professor Dr. Michael Webber and his former student researcher Amanda Cuellar***, these pounds of wasted food add up to the energy equivalent of throwing 350 million barrels of oil each year.  


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


To put it in perspective, this wasted energy is about twice the amount of energy that Switzerland consumes in an entire year. According to Webber and Cuellar:

“The amount of energy embedded in the food we throw away is more than all the energy we get from the corn ethanol we produce in a year, so this is a big number and it’s a big, underutilized policy option for us to consider.”

One can read the entire report by Webber and Cuellar at this link.

Reference:

1. Cuellar, Amanda and M.E. Webber. Wasted Food, Wasted ENergy: The Embedded Energy in Food Waste in the United States. Environ. Sci. Technol., 2010, 44 (16), pp 6464–6469 DOI: 10.1021/es100310d Publication Date (Web): July 21, 2010

***This research was previously discussed on Plugged In on May 16, 2012.

 

 

 

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe