Jordan Ellenberg's Favorite Theorem

The University of Wisconsin mathematician loves Fermat's little theorem and knows just the right cheese to pair with it

Jordan Ellenberg.

Mats Rudels

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Today’s episode of My Favorite Theorem features University of Wisconsin mathematician Jordan Ellenberg. You can listen here or at kpknudson.com. We had a few audio issues in this episode, so if you missed anything, there’s a transcript here.

Ellenberg’s favorite theorem is Fermat’s Little Theorem, a not-so-little result in number theory. It states that if p is a prime number (a positive whole number that is divisible by exactly two distinct factors: itself and 1), and a is any whole number, then ap has a remainder of a when divided by p. As shorthand, mathematicians would say ap is congruent to amod p. (Mod, short for modulo, just means the remainder when divided by a number. So the number 19 is congruent to 4 mod 5 or 1 mod 3 because it’s 4 more than 15, which is a multiple of 5, and 1 more than 18, which is a multiple of 3.)


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Ellenberg stated the theorem in the special case that a=2. Then the theorem becomes the statement that when p is prime, 2p is congruent to 2 mod p, or 2p has a remainder of 2 when divided by p. You can verify this easily for yourself for a few small prime numbers p: 23=8, which has a remainder of 2 when divided by 3. 25=32, which has a remainder of 2 when divided by 5, and so on.

As you’ll hear in the episode, Ellenberg relates Fermat's little theorem to the coefficients of Pascal’s triangle. This triangle (poorly named because it was studied by Persian, Indian, and Chinese mathematicians centuries before Pascal got his hands on it) shows up in a variety of different guises in mathematics. To get the entries in Pascal’s triangle, you start with a 1 by itself in row 0. (Labeling this row 0 instead of 1 makes bookkeeping a little more convenient.) Then each subsequent entry is the sum of the numbers diagonally above it.

An animation showing where entries in Pascal's triangle come from. Credit: Hersfold Wikimedia

Remembering that we start with row 0, the numbers in row n sum up to 2n.

Row 0-9 of Pascal's triangle. If you add up the entries in a prime numbered row like 3 or 7 and divide it by the row number, you will always have the remainder 2.

Ellenberg describes how you can look at the entries in prime-numbered rows and practically observe the theorem, at least for the a=2 case, falling out in front of you.

Gjetost is a caramel-colored Norwegian cheese that pairs well with modular arithmetic. Credit: Maebmij and Ranveig Wikimedia(CC BY-SA 3.0)

As a resident of Wisconsin, Ellenberg felt a duty to pair his theorem with cheese. He went with gjetost, a caramel-colored Norwegian cheese. You’ll have to listen to the episode to find out why this is the perfect match for Fermat’s Little Theorem.

You can find Ellenberg online at his website JordanEllenberg.com and his Twitter account @JSEllenberg. He is the author of the pop math book How Not to Be Wrong.

You can find more information about the mathematicians and theorems featured in this podcast, along with other delightful mathematical treats, at kpknudson.com and here at Roots of Unity. A transcript is available here. You can subscribe and review the podcast on iTunes and other podcast delivery systems. We love to hear from our listeners, so please drop us a line at myfavoritetheorem@gmail.com. Kevin Knudson’s handle on Twitter is @niveknosdunk, and mine is @evelynjlamb. The show itself also has a Twitter feed: @myfavethm and a Facebook page. Join us next time to learn another fascinating piece of mathematics.

Previously on My Favorite Theorem:

Episode 0: Your hosts' favorite theorems Episode 1: Amie Wilkinson’s favorite theorem Episode 2: Dave Richeson's favorite theorem Episode 3: Emille Davie Lawrence's favorite theorem

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe