Geologists Have an Incentive to Be Naughty

Why you should never try to get a geology buff to behave by threatening them with coal in their stocking

Image is a close-up view of a lump of black anthracite coal from Black Mesa Mine, Arizona.

Anthracite coal from Black Mesa Mine, Arizona.

Dana Hunter

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


I never understood why getting a lump of coal instead of presents should be considered a threat. I'm a coal miner's daughter (yes, really. Okay, so he was an engineer at a coal mine, but it counts). The best thing my dad ever gave me, aside from the pony and the playhouse and the Breyer Horse stable that I adored for nearly a decade, was a lump of coal. I'd been after him about it for a long time. "Daddy, please bring me a lump of coal from the mine! Pleasepleaseplease I'll be good!"

If I'd had a better grasp on reverse psychology, or my dad a somewhat better-developed sense of irony, I might have ended up with one earlier. Regardless, one day, he arrived home with an enormous black chunk of ancient swamp, and I cherished it until we lost it in a move.

I'll never forget visiting Black Mesa once. I was very young, probably no older than 7 or 8, and we drove through a black canyon gashed by machines in the thick seams of coal that made up the mesa. I don't know what I'd expected, maybe a tunnel, like I'd seen in various pictures of mining operations. I stared, slack-jawed and thrilled beyond containment, at those shiny black walls towering above me. And then there was the fire, and the truck with a mounted hose spraying an enormous rooster tail of water on it. Fires sometimes started in the seams, my dad told my astonished young self. They'd burn for years. You couldn't really fight them so much as contain their spread. They sometimes could manage it with water; sometimes, they'd have to bury the blaze and hope it would burn itself out safely under the soil.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


I'd never considered that there might be any such thing as a fire that burned year after year, that no number of fire trucks and firefighters could defeat. And when I got my hands on that hard lump of coal, and realized this tough shiny stuff was what did the burning, I was amazed. It didn't really sink in then, but it did later. These were rocks. Rocks that burn.

What fool decided this was a disincentive to naughtiness?

But kids seemed to take that threat seriously. They'd rather have the shiny toys than a shiny lump of coal. I don't think they were future geologists, or there would have been a considerable uptick in the naughty quotient whenever that threat was made.

Angry parent: "If you don't stop doing X bad thing, all Santa's giving you this Christmas is a lump of coal!"

Future geologist: "Awesome! Two, please!"

My original lump has been replaced by a smaller but no less cherished chunk purchased from a wonderful little rock shop down in Cottonwood, AZ. And that wee delight has been joined by several bits picked up during rambles along Coal Creek (aptly named), which was my first opportunity to pick up coal in the wild. I love this stuff.

coal creek
Caption: Coal in streambank at Coal Creek near Seattle, Washington. Credit: Dana Hunter
And why am I babbling about coal just now? Partly because I've been extremely lax in posting on geological topics lately. Mostly because one of my Twitter friends posted a link to this perfect gift for geologists: coal candy! Which you can make, at home, and use your rock hammer to break, and just seems like the perfect thing for geologists to make and/or receive. I saw that, and thought of Coal Creek and Black Mesa and Evelyn's geophoto meme, and thus inspiration did strike.

But I've saved the best for last. It hasn't much to do with coal, except it's on Coal Creek, and it's just the most awesome orange waterfall I've ever had the pleasure of getting up-close and personal with:

waterfall coal creek
Caption: Orange Waterfall on Coal Creek. Credit: Dana Hunter
That lovely orange hue is probably courtesy of chemotrophic bacteria, according to a commenter on the original adventure report. It certainly adds a little verve to the scene. And what's even nicer is that you can get to it by following a stream bed filled with chunks of petrified wood and lots and lots of coal.

And if you're very naughty, I may venture back out there and collect a lump or two just for you.

 

A version of this post originally appeared on Rosetta Stones in 2013.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe