A few words on diversity

I just wanted to write a quick post on the events of the past month here at SciAm blogs. When my friend and fellow SciAm Blogger Dr. Danielle Lee posted about her experiences with a now notorious (and now fired) employee at Biology-Online, I cheered her on.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


I just wanted to write a quick post on the events of the past month here at SciAm blogs. When my friend and fellow SciAm Blogger Dr. Danielle Lee posted about her experiences with a now notorious (and now fired) employee at Biology-Online, I cheered her on. I especially loved that she even used a Tanzanian khanga to illustrate her point because it's a cloth from my mother's home country and a place where she has done extensive scientific research.

But then the post was pulled, the incident blew up all over the internet, and I began to feel very conscious of the fact that many people were watching it all. As the only other black woman blogging on the network, I felt a bit conspicuous and that feeling translated into staying silent and watching the saga unfold before commenting. Then the whole incident was eclipsed a bit by the events surrounding the resignation of Bora Zivkovic. While I think the events of this month have been difficult for everyone at SciAm, I am impressed by the resilience, strength, and insight of my colleagues and friends in the online science communication world. I am glad that the events of October have started a dialogue about issues of diversity, privilege, power, and harassment in science and beyond.

I am very lucky to have never experienced sexual harassment from a boss or colleague. The main extent of harassment I've faced is from cat callers on the street, which is easy enough to ignore without any potential professional consequences. Many others have spoken of their experiences with harassment this month, and you should read their posts for some amazingly heartfelt perspectives on that topic. But I want to speak to something that resonated with me after the events of this month, and that is the insidious power of microaggressions.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Microaggressions are things that many minorities are often considered oversensitive or "crazy" for speaking out against. They are prevalent and can accumulate over a lifetime, instilling self doubt, negative feelings, and ultimately decreased diversity due to feeling alienated and oppressed by constant mini-assaults. A salient quote from the Gawker article linked in this paragraph rings true to some of my personal experiences with microaggressions.

"I believe there are numerous valid reasons to criticize Kanye West, but his rant on Jimmy Kimmel Live is not one of them. You may think he sounded crazy, but it wasn't a kind of crazy that was foreign to me—or, I'd assume, millions of other Americans. It was the crazy that comes from being stared at for daring to look different while eating breakfast with your mom. It was the crazy that comes from never knowing if you deserved to be kicked out of that bar. It was the crazy that comes from being the one person stopped by a cop amidst a sea of white people. "This is racist," you might say to the cop. "Prove it," he might say back. And at that moment, you can't."

#ripplesofdoubt has been a trending topic surrounding the subject of harassment, and I just wanted to point out that the pain of ripples of doubt apply when people experience offhand comments or or actions that make them wonder whether the world at large views everything for which they've worked through a lens of their racial and/or gender identity.

There was a ton of good writing on all these issues this month, which gives me great hope that people as a whole will take extra care to consider the perspectives of minorities of all types. I'm linking some of my favorite reads on this topic below.

Kanye West Knows You Think He Sounded Nuts on Kimmel

Guest Post 3: If these blogs could talk: characterizing power, privilege, and everyday life in the sciences

Why #standingwithDNLee’s Orientation towards SciAm Was So Important

Jeepers, Creepers: What Does Sexual Harassment Look Like?

The Power of Harassment series on LadyBits

About Princess Ojiaku

Hey there! I'm a graduate student at the University of Wisconsin Madison in the Neuroscience and Public Policy program. I'm also a musician who played in two bands in North Carolina, one called Pink Flag and another called Deals. My personal passions are science, music, and cycling as transportation.

I got into science as a kid while tagging along and watching my mom do experiments in her lab. I found that while I loved science, I didn't want to be alone in an ivory tower, crunching data that few others would understand. I also noticed that many other people thought science was this scary and incomprehensible entity of obscurity. When I realized that there were people working to make science fun and accessible to everyone, I knew that this was exactly what I wanted to do. The two things I find the most immensely interesting and continually impressing are music and neuroscience, so these are the topics that I'll focus on in my blog. Philosophy and politics are my second loves, so I might pop in an occasional post on these topics as well. Ultimately I am here to share things that give me wonder. I hope that reading Science with Moxie gives you a bit of that wonder too.

More by Princess Ojiaku

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe