Focus your mind: The rise of concentrated solar power

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Editor's Note: Scientific American 's George Musser will be chronicling his experiences installing solar panels in Solar at Home (formerly 60-Second Solar). Read his introduction here and see all posts here.

I had a fun talk yesterday afternoon with Bob MacDonald, the CEO of Skyline Solar, makers of a new concentrated photovoltaic (CPV) array. The thing looks rather like a big solar cooker, with a long mirror that focuses sunlight so that you only need a tenth as many solar cells to cover a given area. CPV may become the first photovoltaic technology to reach cost parity with fossil fuels.

The basic idea, which goes back to the '70s, is to use fewer solar cells and shine more light on each one. A cell's rated output is based on straight-on, full-on sunlight, which is about 1,000 watts per square meter at Earth's surface. In light that is hundreds or even thousands of times brighter, the cell will generate proportionally more current and therefore proportionally more power. (The voltage remains fixed by quantum physics.) Indeed, some types of cells, such as those that capture a wider range of the solar spectrum, perform best under intense light.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The main tradeoff is that the cells then absorb more heat. The Skyline array relies on passive cooling -- namely, natural air flow around metal fins mounted on the back of the cells. You also have to factor in the cost of the mirror and, if the panels track the sun, motors. For small residential systems, regular flat panels are still cheaper, but CPV becomes economical for systems bigger than about 50 kW, such as those that are starting to show up on the roofs of shopping malls. For truly gigantic arrays, those bigger than about 50 MW, the cost of silicon begins to add up and solar thermal systems, which heat up a fluid to spin a turbine, become cheaper.

One of CPV's hangups has been the cost of manufacturing and installation, but MacDonald says his company has come up with a simplified mechanical design that can be built on a converted car assembly line. The units are sized to fit into a standard shipping container and are fully preassembled to make them easy to plug in at the site. A 1 MW array will consume about five acres.  The company set up a 27 kW demo system in San Jose last May and expects to start shipping its production units later this year.

Initially, MacDonald says, they will cost about 15 cents per kW-hr, about half the cost of regular solar panels. If so, it is already competitive with nuclear power and closing in on fossil power, which runs about 10 cents per kW-hr (varying with location), not counting its environmental costs.

CPV exempifies how the challenge of solar power these days is not the high-tech lab work but the low-tech, nuts-and-bolts cost-cutting. MacDonald's description of how arrays must be tailored for their site also made me appreciate how the two ends of the solar market are moving in opposite directions. For homeowners, systems are becoming more standardized to reduce installation costs, make it easier to get permits, and allow DIYers to put up panels on their own. But large farms of solar panels are becoming less standardized. Though their components may be plug and play, their overall design needs to be customized to squeeze out every last watt. "There's a lot of benefit to be had by purpose engineering," MacDonald says.

Photo courtesy of Skyline Solar

 

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe