A Photographic Survey of the American Yard

Though it’s tempting to think you must spend thousands of dollars on equipment to take great photographs, Joshua White is helping prove that the best camera is the one you have on you when the inspiration strikes.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Though it's tempting to think you must spend thousands of dollars on equipment to take great photographs, Joshua White is helping prove that the best camera is the one you have on you when the inspiration strikes. His series, titled "A Photographic Survey of the American Yard," is taken entirely with his iPhone and is made up of hundreds of little moments when he was gripped by the beauty of something in front of him. No exotic locations, no extravagant expenses. Just a human observing his world as he moves through it.

White is a professional photographer, but this series proves he is also a student of natural history. Like the most skilled science illustrators, White forces us to focus on the structures of his subjects by replacing color with a limited palette and presenting solitary specimens in a subtle ring of light (reminiscent of looking through a microscope). The result is a careful meditation on the life that surrounds him.

The series reminds me of the great age of exploration when much of the world's plants and animals were unknown to science and exploratory missions gave rise to beautifully illustrated tomes of newly described species. And while only the thickest rainforests and deepest oceans still hide macro species yet to be discovered, White's approach is a reminder that each of us has a world to discover if we care to slow down and observe it. We can start with our backyards, and from there, who knows where our curiosity will lead.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


More of the 500-image-strong series is up at Joshua White's portfolio site, and you can follow ongoing additions at his tumblr.

If you're inspired to document your world in a similar fashion and you can't spend a fortune on professional camera equipment, SciAm's Alex Wild has a series of posts in his Thrifty Thursday series at Compound Eye that will get you off to a good start with what you have. The world awaits!

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe