The Dudley Bug

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


One of the things that fascinates me most about the current state of science-based art, are the roots we can retroactively look to in pre-scientific eras. Most artistic movements claim ancestry from previous movements, such as the Surrealists arising out of the Symbolists, who in part arose out of the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood, who claimed the mantle of the Mannerists who painted in the manner of Italian Renaissance masters.

There's no science-art manifesto in the fine art world, but there are threads and inspirations that can be looked back upon as precursors to scientific illustration and science-inspired fine art. Some, like Albrecht Durer's 1512 painting known as Wing of a Blue Roller can be seen as studies that in their technical ability are a type of proto-scientific illustration, describing in accurate detail the anatomy of an animal - though let's remember, it was not used for that. This was most likely a study for a future work, or one done as an exercise for curiosity and practice: not one to instruct veterinarians on signs of avian feather health or for a study on comparative anatomy in a journal.

Here's one I find particularly interesting. The Dudley Bug, or Dudley Locust:


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


See it on the heraldic crest there, in red, between the anchor for the sea and the miner's Davy Lamp? It's a trilobite, specifically Calymene blumenbachi.

The quarries in the area around Dudley yielded swarms of these approximately 430-million year old Silurian fossils. They weren't red, they actually came out of yellowish sediments - the red has more significance to the coat of arms this design was derived from. Although this heraldic symbol was adopted in the 1950's, the local importance of the Dudley Bug stretches back much further, and the trilobites are even in the walls of the 11th century Dudley Castle. What to do with a mysterious object that has become intensely commonplace? Incorporate it into your identity. Carve big ones as if they were sentinels or totems. Raise your community's kids to understand it (best Easter Hunt EVAR!). As someone who has a trilobite tattooed on his forearm, I know how few people recognise the animal for what it is.

What a terrific way to demonstrate in-group/out-group dynamics than a mysterious stone "locust" smack dab in the middle of a crest? You would either be familiar with the local bug, or not. The enigma becomes a point of social pride.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe