If We Could Walk Through Each Others’ Thoughts

If we could walk through each others’ thoughts, what would they look like? Tangled gardens overgrown with living, growing ideas, each competing for space as they reach for the sun?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


If we could walk through each others' thoughts, what would they look like? Tangled gardens overgrown with living, growing ideas, each competing for space as they reach for the sun? Michael Frank's dreamy, yet surprisingly tangible scenes are full of emotion and thought - foreign, yet perfectly understandable - a window into his inner landscape. See more of this fantastical BOTANIKA series and Frank's other projects at his portfolio site, Behance, CGSociety, DeviantArt, and Twitter.

___________

For the third year running, we are turning September into a month-long celebration of science artists by delivering a new morsel of sciart to chew on each day. Totally yum? Check out what was previously featured on this day:


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


2013: A Dose of David by Glendon Mellow

 

 

2012: Glowing in the Light of Darkness by Russell Dickerson

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe