August 7, 2015

Google Logo Add Us On GoogleAdd SciAm

Is it Time for Twitter to Verify Artists?

Celebrities, journalists and politicians are all likely to receive the coveted Verified badge on Twitter. Presumably, this is due to all of these careers adding value to the platform for the average user, and to distinguish their identities from malicious imposters and parody accounts.

There's another group that adds consistent value to the experience of using Twitter: image creators.

By Glendon Mellow

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American

Celebrities, journalists and politicians are all likely to receive the coveted Verified badge on Twitter. Presumably, this is due to all of these careers adding value to the platform for the average user, and to distinguish their identities from malicious imposters and parody accounts.

There's another group that adds consistent value to the experience of using Twitter: image creators. Fine artists, illustrators, videogame and movie conceptual artists, comic book artists, web cartoonists and professional photgraphers all add a tremendous amount of value - the images appear right in your feed! - to the Twitter platform. 

 

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

(Retweet this ^^^ if you agree!)

I think the time has come for a Verified Artist badge. It would allow users to know they are retweeting from the source. It could potentially raise the profile of the creators themselves, instead of the rapid image-churning sites like @HistoryInPics and @IFLScience. Obviously it wouldn't cut down on all uncredited sharing. But images have been proven to draw more attention on social media than posts without them - it's why Twitter began putting images and then video inline in your feed in the first place.

Agree? Disagree? Let me know on Twitter @FlyingTrilobite, and if you agree, retweet the first tweet embedded above (also found here). 

Yes, I have violated Twitter's ToS and messed with their logo. Again. To create value and extend their brand, of course.

 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe