Life on Mars Will Mess with Your Head

Sure, you've experienced Eastern time, Pacific time and Greenwich Mean Time, but what's it like to live on Martian time?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Aside from staying up way too late catching up on our favorite tv shows, most of us don’t mess too radically with the 24-hour day cycle. True, night shift workers invert it and newborns and insomnia mess with it, but we are so profoundly ruled by Earth’s 24-hour rotation that very few of us ponder how this fact makes us uniquely unsuited for life beyond our home planet.

There are huge differences in the lengths of days on the planets in our solar system. The shortest day is on Jupiter - just 10 breezy hours - and the longest is a punishing 5,832 hours (crazy Venus!). Mars has the most similar day to ours, with each Martian day approximately 41 minutes longer than a day on Earth. That seems like a trivial enough difference that it wouldn’t be too disorienting, right? Artist Sara Morawetz is challenging herself to find out.

Living on Martian time; Image ©Sara Morawetz


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Through August 22nd, Morawetz is living on Martian time as a performance art piece titled How the Stars Stand at Open Source Gallery in Brooklyn, NY. Her stunt will last 37 days - long enough for her days to completely invert and then slowly return to normal, not unlike a full waxing and waning cycle of the moon. By sheer coincidence, this month’s Scientific American Mind has a fascinating article on what exactly Morawetz is submitting her body to (spoiler: every organ in her body is likely in distress), but we’ll let her read that article after her experiment is over, shall we? In the meantime, you can see the effects for yourself: there is a live cam focused on her room in the gallery for your viewing enjoyment.

Artist Sara Morawetz living on Martian time at Open Source Gallery in Brooklyn, NY; Image ©Sara Morawetz

How the Stars Stand (project website) is on view at Open Source Gallery, 306 17th street, Brooklyn, NY 11215, through August 22, 2015. Check out the livestream of the performance and drop by the gallery at 6pm August 22 for a lecture by Dr. Michael Allison of the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe