What Does a Scientific Glass Blower Make?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


I came across so many interesting images last week researching my scientific glass blowing post that I thought I'd share a few more here. This is a blog about imagery after all, right? You'll forgive my lack of song and dance, then?

Michael Souza

This is one of Michael Souza's aluminosilicate creations. You'll recall aluminosilicate glass is a notoriously difficult material to work with and Souza has made a name for himself doing just that. This particular creation is a nuclear target cell for large particle accelerators such as CEBAF at Jefferson Lab and SLAC at Stanford.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The cells are filled with highly magnetic helium gas at pressures approaching 300 psi and put into a magnetic field so as to align the atoms and their nuclei. When the beam of particles is sent around the accelerator and hits the helium gas in the chambers, it smashes the nuclei and gives off quarks. Measuring the direction and speed at which these quarks are dispersed gives us a greater understanding of the nature of matter.

Adams & Chittenden Scientific Glass

This is just one of many hand-blown devices you can get from a scientific glass blowing company like Adams & Chittenden Scientific Glass. George Chittenden says, "I think one of the reasons we become glassblowers is the amazing qualities of the glass itself. We take a lot of pride in our work and strive to make it not only functional (and economical) but beautiful as well."

True to form, the Adams and Chittenden site features a gallery of artistic pieces they've created, including these intriguing shapes: klein bottles. Klein bottles are non-orientable, one-sided surfaces containing neither an interior or an exterior. (For an elegant illustrated explanation, see Konrad Polthier's article in Plus Magazine.)

Cliff Stoll's Klein Bottles

To quote Acme Klein bottles, "To a mathematician, it's a one-sided bottle, homeomorphic to a disc with two crosscaps..." [or if you prefer:

x = cos(u)*(cos(u/2)*(sqrt_2+cos(v))+(sin(u/2)*sin(v)*cos(v)))

y = sin(u)*(cos(u/2)*(sqrt_2+cos(v))+(sin(u/2)*sin(v)*cos(v)))

z = -1*sin(u/2)*(sqrt_2+cos(v))+cos(u/2)*sin(v)*cos(v)

Got that?!] "To a glass worker, it's a major challenge in glassblowing. To the casual viewer, it's an accomplishment in art, glass, and mathematics." I'll say!

And just in case you were under the impression that mathematicians never have any fun, here is a meter-tall Klein bottle which begets a clever little oxymoron (if you speak German): RiesenKLEINflasche (or giant small bottle, if you don't). Check out Stoll's entertaining account of how it was manufactured.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe