The Most Fascinating Image You Can See On LinkedIn

Nothing can say”Amazing art!” the way an intricate web with your own name in the center can. I am glorious. LinkedIn launched a feature called InMaps back in 2011 and they produce visually arresting, zoomable depictions of your network.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Nothing can say"Amazing art!" the way an intricate web with your own name in the center can. I am glorious.

LinkedIn launched a feature called InMaps back in 2011 and they produce visually arresting, zoomable depictions of your network.

Over the last 6 or 7 years, I've developed my LinkedIn network in a mostly casual way. If I see science based artists, I usually add them to my network. And that's why I'm sharing this. From a Glendon-Mellow-centric point of view, I found it fascinating (of course I did) to look at the world of SciArt as it appears in my network.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The giant blue mass to the right of my InMap are science bloggers, writers, tweeters and journalists. People I know from ScienceOnline, here on Scientific American and the whole #scicomm community. The dense orange mass on the left represents my colleagues at INVIVO Communications.

What I found interesting about the way my network is displayed are the illustrators:

In a very helix-shaped swirl spiralling out from the orange are grey dots of biomedical illustrators & animators, many members of the Association of Medical Illustrators. Which makes sense, since INVIVO employs some of the best medical animators in the industry (you guys rock, come on).

From the grey dots coalesces the upper-center green mass of nature + science illustrators, many from the Guild of Natural Science Illustrators.

In a large vapourous cloud in the center of the visualization are pale pink dots on top and darker magenta on bottom. These are paleontology illustrators (pale pink) and Toronto-based science artists (magenta).

Through just the simple lense of my LinkedIn contacts one can see interrelations between various disciplines or SciArt and illustration, and how distinct they can appear from one another - and from the world of science communication. Science artists, illustrators, animators and cartoonists: we have to work to keep infiltrating that blue cloud!

____________________

I'd love to keep developing this map! If you're a scientific illustrator or science artists, connect with me on LinkedIn.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe