Is Mindfulness Good for Everything? Maybe Not for Learning to Ride a Bike

Searching the keyword “mindfulness” on Google News turns up more than 9,000 results posted over the last few weeks. The vast majority of headlines arrive in your browser resonating with  hyperbolic overtones: “Pioneering Lee School uses mindfulness for pupils to beat stress and boost exams” “How to Manage Your 40,000 Thoughts A Day and Keep [...]

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Searching the keyword "mindfulness" on Google News turns up more than 9,000 results posted over the last few weeks.

The vast majority of headlines arrive in your browser resonating with hyperbolic overtones:

"Pioneering Lee School uses mindfulness for pupils to beat stress and boost exams"


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


"How to Manage Your 40,000 Thoughts A Day and Keep Moving Forward"

"How Does Mindfulness Reduce Depression?"

"The value of mindfulness in Jewish Life"

Anche la Mindfulness abbassa la pressione sanguigna

In the inevitable contrarian dialectics of journalism, this string of good news cannot continue forever. In other words, can mindfulness—and the meditation practices that foster it—really be good for everything?

A small cumulus cloud entered the picture Tuesday at the only event in the scientific world that boasts a big enough attendance to almost fill a small stadium for professional baseball. Researchers from Georgetown University Medical Center reported on Nov. 12 at the Society for Neuroscience annual meeting in San Diego that those with a low degree of mindfulness scored higher on pattern-finding tests than those who were further along the pathway toward enlightenment. (Mindfulness is defined here as attention to what is happening in the present moment in one's surroundings.)

Those registering lower on a test that measured mindfulness were able to identify more quickly a series of repeating geometric patterns on a computer screen that they were unaware they were learning. This type of unconscious, or implicit, learning is the same automatic mental process used in teaching yourself to ride a bike or that a child marshals in intuiting underlying grammatical rules by listening to the ways a parent strings together sentences.

The work—performed by Chelsea Stillman and Darlene Howard— raises the question of whether mindfulness, in promoting an acute awareness of the sights and sounds that make up everyday experience, can inhibit the implicit learning that a skateboarder uses in mastering the Bertlemann Slide.

Even before presenting their work at the neuroscience meeting, the researchers invoked the "more research is needed" mantra. In an e-mail, Howard emphasized that this unpublished preliminary report is only "correlational"—there was no control group. Don't drop your meditation practice, she urges, because of abundant evidence of other cognitive benefits. Mindfulness, for instance, might prevent formation of a bad habit—drinking or smoking—that also occurs through implicit learning.

Even if it is only preliminary, the study did what good pilot studies should do by rattling a bit the consensus view, even for a technique that is non-toxic and supposedly good for everything from easing pain to providing the needed mental calm to take the SATs.

Image Source: Nova/Wikipedia Commons

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe