Hooks can be deceiving

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Every animal has its own parasites to worry about, but canivorous reptiles and amphibians have to deal with particularly gruesome ones. They can become infected with small, worm-like creatures called pentastomes that live inside their lungs, where they suck blood from ruptured blood vessels. Reptiles pick up the parasite when they eat infected prey.

Pentastomes are true escape artists. Once they realize they've entered a reptile stomach, they use their sharp hooks to claw themselves a way to the victim's lungs. In an experiment where pentastomes were implanted in a gecko's stomach, the parasites invaded the lungs in as little as four hours.

Despite their interesting and somewhat disturbing life cycle, pentastomes have always been a bit obscure. This is not at all surprising, said parasitologist John Riley, if you consider the nature of some their hosts: crocodiles, monitor lizards and various venomous and constricting snakes. With a sense of self-humour, he quipped: "To employ these hosts as vehicles for pentastomes in long-term studies is a particularly esoteric branch of parasitological research, with relatively few (one?) adherents!"


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Aside from their hosts, the pentastome themselves are also problematic to handle. When a living pentastome is even slightly punctured, it deflates and contracts. For these and other reasons, parasitologists identify pentastomes using differences in the size and shape of the hooks. What pleads for using the hooks is that they are rigid and tough, and can easily be removed and measured.

But hooks don't tell simple stories. Hook length and shape can vary within a single species, just like the length and shape of humans varies. Small differences in other body parts are also used for identification, such as male genitalia, but these measurements are more prone to errors if two specimens haven't been treated in the same way.

There are more than enough examples where pentastomes were misidentified. A parasite from Taiwan first described as a new pentastome for example, only to be reassigned to an pre-existing species one year later. Twenty years later it turned out this second assignment was wrong too: the parasite was a member of a different species altogether.

In a recent paper in PLoS ONE, parasitologists have uncovered another case of mistaken identities. In a parasite survey of cane toads, they came across pentastomes with two kinds of hooks. Some were sharp, others blunt. The pentastomes with sharp hooks were known to infect amphibians, but the blunt-hooked pentastomes had only been seen in lizard lungs before. Indeed, the team also found these parasites inside the Asian house gecko.

If the researchers had followed taxonomic guidelines, they should have classified the pentastomes as belonging to two different species, Raillietiella indica for the sharp-hooked parasites and Raillietiella frenatus for the blunt ones. But the team suspected that something else was going on. A DNA analysis confirmed their hunch. All the parasites, with sharp and blunt hooks, from toads and geckos, were genetically identical to each other. This suggested that these parasites are not two species, but one.

One strange pentastome provided additional evidence for this idea. By chance, this parasite had retained the hooks of previous molts. The oldest of its hooks were small and sharp, while the youngest were broad and blunt. So as the pentastome matures, the size and shape of their hooks change. Raillietiella indica is just an early stage of Raillietiella frenatus.

The team also discovered that body size and hook shape were correlated. In other words, larger pentastomes also tend to have blunter hooks. Combined with the observation that pentastomes grow to larger sizes in geckos than they do in toads, and it becomes easy to see why these parasites appear to be of different forms.

John Riley already warned for potential confusion that hooks can sow in his 1986 overview of pentastome biology: "In practice hook data can only be meaningfully compared between fully adult specimens, and a major obstacle arises in deciding what constitutes the adult stage." He hit the hook on its head.


Pictures:

Pentastome images from reference.


References:

Kelehear C, Spratt DM, Dubey S, Brown GP, & Shine R (2011). Using combined morphological, allometric and molecular approaches to identify species of the genus raillietiella (pentastomida). PloS one, 6 (9) PMID: 21949796

My name is Lucas Brouwers. Most of my writings here will concern evolution somehow, which is the one topic that fascinates most. I like exploring evolution through bioinformatics or molecular biology, though I won't eschew other fields of science if the topic is interesting. Please call out any mistakes I might make while doing so! Science is amazing and I love writing about science. I currently write for a daily Dutch newspaper, where I hope I can convince others of the awesomeness of science and evolution.

More by Lucas Brouwers

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe