Another Example of How Health Care Disparities Kill

Atrial fibrillation, or AFib, is treated less aggressively if you’re not white and male

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Health care disparities can lead to drastic differences in longevity between residents of different neighborhoods within American cities. Sadly, Chicago, where I live, is home to the largest such difference. A 2019 analysis of life expectancy gaps by New York University conducted in the 500 largest U.S. cities found that Chicago has a gap of 30 years: while residents of downtown Chicago live on average to be 90, residents of Englewood, Ill., just nine miles away, live on average to be only 60. Other cities are not far behind Chicago, with Washington, D.C., having a gap of 27.5 years; New York City with 27.4 years; and New Orleans and Buffalo, N.Y., both with gaps of 25.8 years.

Recently, my co-authors and I performed a medical literature research of known sex disparities in one particular type of cardiovascular disease, an arrhythmia problem called atrial fibrillation, or AFib, which can be a consequence of heart failure—and is also a leading cause of both heart failure and preventable stroke. It’s a complex disease, requiring comprehensive care. Reasons for these disparities are not completely known, but research has shown that white men present with symptoms to their doctors earlier and accept treatment more readily than women.

The showed that when it even when women do accept treatment, women were not as aggressively treated as men for preventing strokes and maintaining a normal heart rhythm. It turns out that there are also racial and ethnic differences when it comes to treating atrial fibrillation. In comparisonstudies of racial differences, the African American population, black men and women, were not as aggressively treated compared to white men and women. However, this disparity problem may not best be solved by cardiologists, but rather by patients themselves with the help of their primary care physicians.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


There are several ways to treat atrial fibrillation and one way is to leave patients in AFib, give stroke preventing medications and control the heart rate to prevent heart failure. The other, more complicated treatment is to convert the rhythm by giving the patient an electrical shock to the chest; giving them medications to maintain a normal rhythm; or performing a procedure called catheter ablation to prevent further episodes. Studies done almost 20 years ago showed that there was no difference in strokes and deaths in treating patients with just controlling the heart rate versus preventing the atrial fibrillation from recurring.

Since then, the treatment has changed because of the increased availability of catheter ablation, which freezes or burns the tissues that cause the arrhythmia. This procedure can improve the patient’s quality of life—but data show that women and black patients are not getting the catheter ablation treatment as much as white men are.

As a cardiologist for 30 years who has taken care of thousands of patients with heart disease, I have seen the suffering of many patients from this terrible illness. Patients, no matter their race or gender, deserve the same care. Health care disparities lead to more patient suffering, unnecessary strokes, and deaths from AFib and other heart diseases. So, patients must be educated and informed by health care professionals about their options, and primary care physicians should understand the different options available to all patients with this disease. Patients can do their part to prevent atrial fibrillation by controlling their blood pressure, drinking alcohol only in moderation, preventing obesity, seeking help, and, if necessary, getting a second opinion about treatment.

Public health officials need to do more to get this information and patient care to communities that most need it. Health care disparities must be addressed by public officials and ensure that patients are informed about their options for their health. Any preventable stroke and death is one too many.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe