On Being a Weird American on the Fourth of July

As the flags and patriotic words fly, that unusual adjective helps me resolve some internal conflicts—and turns out to be widely useful

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


In celebration of Independence Day, I want to share why I think of myself as a weird American.

I’m very proud to be a citizen of the United States. It’s one of the greatest countries in the world, which helps explain why my family immigrated to the US from the Republic of Moldova when I was 10. Growing up in New York City, the American multicultural mecca, I grew to love America as a beacon of hope for democracy and freedom for millions of people across the globe. Our universities consistently produce ground-breaking research; our companies drive innovation for the global economy; our military helps keep peace in many global conflicts.

Yet I’ve always been a bit uncomfortable thinking of myself as “American,” especially around July Fourth. People break out their flags and shoot off red, white and blue fireworks. Politicians make speeches with the message “America, Right or Wrong,” supporting whatever the government happens to do as the correct thing.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Well, I have trouble identifying with such patriotic displays, and the label of “American” feels restrictive and confining. Adopting the label wholesale obliges me to identify with aspects of the U.S. that I am not happy about. I much prefer the great American statesman Carl Shurz’s take, “My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right.”

For instance, whereas to some we may be the beacon of democracy, our own two-party system leaves a lot to be desired. There are many democratic systems that permit more than two major parties, which let people make choices that are closer to their values and provides alternatives to the current partisan gridlock. Another problem lies in the role our financial system played in the 2008 market crash. Our banks made very risky loans to home buyers and then covered up that fact with fancy financial instruments.

So I decided to spend some time thinking up a way to address this feeling of discomfort. I came up with an approach that draws on the strategy of reframing, a research-based approach involving changing our framework of thinking.

Specifically, I tried putting the term “weird” before “American.” The term “weird” had a wonderful impact. It fit my desire to identify overall with the label “American” but allowed me to separate myself from any aspects of the label I don’t support. This represents a specific instance of the broader research-informed strategy of distancing oneself from an uncomfortable situation, to think calmly about it and make good decisions about how to proceed forward.

Once I started thinking about myself as a “weird American,” I freed myself from the anxiety of not fully identifying with that label. I was able to think through calmly which aspects of being American I identified with and which I did not, and set the latter aside from my identity. When relevant—for example when meeting foreigners—I used the term “weird American” to describe myself, and we had great conversations about what I meant.

Based on that experience, I started putting “weird” in front of other labels that did not feel fully comfortable to me. This practice helped me address problems not only in public life but in private life as well. For example, although I love my mother greatly, she and I don’t always see eye to eye. Before I devised the weird trick, I wound up feeling really bad whenever we fought. Now, when we have tensions I just think of myself as a weird son. This thought pattern makes much calmer and less stressed at such times.

Another example comes from my civic life. I serve as the volunteer president of a nonprofit devoted to fighting lies in politics as well as in other areas, and putting on a “weird” thinking hat enables me and other participants to think outside the box and launch bold experiments that sometimes fail miserably, but sometimes succeed beyond our wildest imagination. An example of the latter is the Pro-Truth Pledge project at ProTruthPledge.org, a new and quickly expanding venture where private citizens and public figures alike commit to honest behaviors, signed by prominent individuals such as Peter Singer and Ethan Bearman.

The term “weird” also enabled me to change my behaviors in useful ways. For example, I am a kind and gentle person intuitively, and strive to be nice to everyone. Being this way, however, has enabled others to exploit my kindness and harm me in the past. Thinking of myself as a “weird nice guy” enables me to distance my behavior from being exclusively nice, and permits me to be less than nice when the occasion calls for it, however unnatural I may find that to be.

Other examples include applying the term weird to myself to allow me to act in nonconformist ways in social settings. Thinking of myself as a weird airplane passenger has enabled me to stand in the back of a plane and stretch to minimize back pains. Labeling myself as a weird pedestrian has permitted me to stop and smell flowers by the sidewalk despite getting strange looks from others.

I hope using the strategy of being “weird” helps some of my fellow Americans have a truly happy Independence Day celebration, and improve their lives in other ways as well!

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe