New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Cutlery Colors Culinary Critique

The weight, color and shape of dining utensils can affect the perceived taste of food. Sophie Bushwick reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

That spoon sure looks yummy. Not that I'm planning on eating my utensils. But the appearance and feel of cutlery influences the taste of food. That’s according to a study in the journal Flavour. [Vanessa Harrar and Charles Spence, The taste of cutlery: how the taste of food is affected by the weight, size, shape, and color of the cutlery used to eat it]
 

It was already known that plate size, background music and even lighting can influence eating habits.

To test the effect of cutlery, researchers served food with utensils of different weights, colors and shapes.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


When volunteers ate yogurt from lighter spoons, they rated its taste as denser and more expensive. Spoon color was important as well. A blue spoon made white yogurt taste less salty than the same yogurt dyed pink. And a black spoon made both yogurts taste less sweet.

Researchers also fed subjects cheddar cheese, who said that eating from a knife made the cheese seem saltier than eating from a fork, spoon or toothpick.

Clearly, outside cues can have a huge influence on how food tastes, and thus on our eating habits. Which may color your choice of place settings at your next dinner party.

—Sophie Bushwick

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]
 

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe