Do Docs' Gifts Lead To Unnecessary Prescriptions?

The organization Consumers International says that pharmaceutical companies exert an undue influence on doctors' prescribing habits in the developing world, by treating the docs to lavish gifts. Cynthia Graber reports.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


American consumer groups have expressed concern about the way pharmaceutical companies lavish gifts and speaking fees upon doctors. They say this may influence what drugs doctors prescribe. But, according to a recent study published by the organization Consumers International, the situation in the developing world is even more extravagant. The study notes that gifts from drug companies include school fees, cars, even down-payments on homes.

Consumers International says they’ve documented that 50 percent of the drugs in the developing world are what they call irrationally prescribed. This means the drugs are unnecessary, or they’re prescribed in doses that are too large, or expensive drugs are prescribed in place of generics. And money spent on unnecessary medicine in poor countries has a much greater impact on overall health than, say, here in the US. The group worries these over-the-top gifts are at least partly to blame. Plus, they say, this type of behavior violates the written ethical policies of drug companies. Those same companies declined to be involved with the report when it was under development. Now that it’s been published, the self-policing regulatory body of the pharmaceutical industry says it intends to deal with these issues.

—Cynthia Graber

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe