Male Sweat Can Smell Sweet or Sour To Different Sniffers

Your genetic makeup determines whether an individual man's sweat can smell to you like vanilla, urine or nothing. Karen Hopkin reports.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


September 17, 2007 -- Male Sweat Can Smell Sweet or Sour To Different Sniffers

A smell is a smell is a smell. Cinnamon smells like cinnamon, skunk smells like skunk, and boys smell like…well, it depends on who you ask.  This week, scientists from Rockefeller University and Duke University announced that a chemical present in high concentrations in the sweat of men can smell like vanilla, or like urine, depending on the genetic makeup of the person doing the sniffing.

The discovery happened like this. Researchers at Rockefeller had asked 400 people to assess the intensity and “pleasantness” of 66 different odors, including androstenone, a chemical in male sweat. In the meantime, the Duke scientists had discovered that androstenone specifically activates a smell receptor called OR7D4. So the researchers teamed up.  The Rockefeller scientists sent blood samples from their sniffers to Duke, where researchers then looked at their receptors.

People with one form of the smell receptor find that androstenone smells foul and intense. While those with a different form detect a hint of vanilla.  And some can’t smell it at all. Which might be a blessing, considering the other options, which are confusing, if not downright offputting.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe