New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Spray-On Explosives Detector

A polymer spray lets minimally trained workers detect explosives residues on surfaces. Steve Mirsky explains, with reporting by Harvey Black

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

[The following is an exact transcript of this podcast.

[Spray sound.] Killing bugs? No. [Spray sound.] Deodorizing the bathroom? No. [Spray sound.] Checking for explosives, yes. Because chemists at the University of California, San Diego have come up with a spray-on polymer film that can spot residue from nitrogen-based explosives such as TNT. It works in as little as 30 seconds.   

When ultraviolet light is shined on a safe, sprayed surface, it glows blue. But when the surface shows traces of a nitrogen-based explosive, it stays dark. Because the explosives soak up the electrons that would emit the blue glow.  The researchers describe the synthesis and properties of their polymers in the Journal of Materials Chemistry.

A single layer of the polymer, about one-thousandth of a gram, is enough for the test. And the polymer is so sensitive, it can detect explosive residues on the order of a few millionths of a gram. Often more than a thousand times that amount is left on surfaces. The method is so promising, it’s already been featured on an episode of CSI: Miami. Chemists know that’s a technology’s acid test.

—Steve Mirsky, with reporting by Harvey Black       


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


60-Second Science is a daily podcast. Subscribe to this Podcast: RSS | iTunes 

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe