Tinnitus Sufferers Should Tune Out

Distraction appears to be an effective technique to avoid the phantom noise of tinnitus. Chelsea Wald reports. For more on the latest tinnitus research, check out the November 1, 2007, edition of the 60-Second Psych podcast at sciam.com/podcast

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


No one ever sits in silence these days. But if we did, many of us would experience tinnitus—that is, phantom noise. It’s normally a high ringing like this: [tone]. But it can sound like crickets [crickets sound], or buzzing [buzzer sound], or music [music clip]. Now a Brazilian study has found that people won’t hear these noises as much if they simply aren’t listening. Volunteers with normal hearing were put in soundproofed rooms. When they focused on listening, almost 70 percent heard phantom noises. But when they focused on seeing, only 45 percent heard noises. And when solving a puzzle, only 20 percent heard noises.

Some people have constant, debilitating tinnitus. For them, this study suggests that therapies to divert attention from hearing could help. For everyone else, well, the best way to avoid tinnitus might be just not to listen very hard. In fact, you should probably forget about this program altogether. Oh, and don’t think about pink elephants.

—Chelsea Wald

For more on the latest tinnitus research, check out the November 1, 2007, edition of the 60-Second Psych podcast at sciam.com/podcast

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe