Iron Snow behind Mercury's Magnetism

The core of Mercury may have flakes of iron falling like snow and initiating a global magnetic field. Cynthia Graber reports.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


[The following is an exact transcript of this podcast.]

On Earth, snow crystals, as we all know, form from frozen water. But scientists believe there are also flakes that fall on Mercury—and they’re made of iron. They published their findings in the journal Geophysical Research Letters. Investigators have been trying to figure out why Mercury is the only other terrestrial planet in our solar system that has a global magnetic field. It's about one hundred times weaker than earth's. No previous models have been able to predict what would cause this type of situation. So researchers at the University of Illinois and Case Western University set up an experiment to try to figure it out.

They created a molten iron and sulfur mixture—similar to Mercury's core. They subjected the mix to high temperatures and pressures. Then they analyzed what happened in this Mercury model. Turns out that as the outer core cools, the iron forms what researchers call cubic “flakes” that slowly fall to the core's center. As the iron snow falls, the sulfur-rich liquid rises. Researchers believe these currents produce the weak magnetic fields—and Mercury's iron snow.

—Cynthia Graber   

60-Second Science is a daily podcast. Subscribe to this Podcast: RSS | iTunes

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe