Fruits and Vegetables Still Not On American Diet

Studies coming out in April show that Americans are falling far short of the recommended daily five servings of fruits and vegetables.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


March 19, 2007 -- Fruits and Vegetables Still Not On American Diet

Okay, listen up.  I don’t know how many times we gotta tell ya, eat your fruits and vegetables.  But it’s not working.  That’s according to two studies coming out in the April issue of the American Journal of Preventive Medicine.  Only 11 percent of Americans are getting the two servings of fruits and three servings of veggies recommended each day.  Those recommendations have been in place since the Dietary Guidelines for Americans were adopted in 1990.  Diets high in fruits and vegetables are associated with lower risks of obesity and chronic conditions such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes and some cancers. 

The new studies looked at 15 thousand Americans between 1988 and 1994 and another 9,000 between 1999 and 2002 and saw no improvement in the later group.  In fact, vegetable intake went down slightly.  Sixty two percent of the study subject typically had no fruit on a given day and 25 percent had no veggies.  Ketchup does not count. 

This is an apple.  (Biting into apple sound.) It’s good for you.  And it’s actually really good.  And it might really keep the doctor away.  Try one. 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe