Copper Knocks out Fish Bacteria

A traditional Korean copper bowl apparently helps remove disease-causing Vibrio bacteria from seafood. Cynthia Graber reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


[The following is an exact transcript of this podcast.]

There’s a traditional bowl in Korea that locals say makes food safer. And they might be right. The bowl is made of almost 80 percent copper. Copper ions can escape into the food. That’s a good thing, according to a presentation at the Society for General Microbiology's autumn meeting. Korean scientists showed that copper ions can destroy bacteria in raw fish and shellfish.


The researchers were concerned about a specific seafood bacteria called Vibrio. It causes about 12 percent of food poisoning cases in Korea. The scientists placed a brass plate—brass is a copper alloy—at the bottom of a fish tank. Copper ions diffused into the water. The bacteria absorb the copper from the water. They die and fall from fish gills and flesh to the bottom of the tank. They’re even flushed out of fish organs. After almost two days, the copper had destroyed 99.99 percent of the Vibrio bacteria in those living fish and shellfish. The scientists recommend placing a brass plate in all tanks that contain fish destined for consumption – and, of course, that Koreans keep using traditional kitchenware.

—Cynthia Graber 

60-Second Science is a daily podcast. Subscribe to this Podcast:

RSS | iTunes

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe