North America Still Bouncing Back from Ice Age

Satellite studies of Earth's gravitational field show that North America is still rebounding from the weight of the massive Laurentide Ice Sheet, which retreated thousands of years ago

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


May 11, 2007  North America Still Bouncing Back From Ice Age

Sheets of ice almost two miles thick once covered most of Canada and the northeastern U.S. And although the ice retreated thousands of years ago, a new study finds that the gravitational field over North America is still undergoing changes as a result of the ice sheets having been there. The study appears in the May 11 issue of the journal Science and is the result of four years of data from two satellites that measure the Earth’s gravitational field. 

The purpose was to examine the gravitational field to find any subtle changes in the distribution of the planet’s mass. And the researchers did uncover evidence that parts of the Earth’s crust are still rebounding from being crushed down by the incredible weight of the massive Laurentide Ice Sheet. The gravitational evidence yields information about the geometry of the ice, which helps our understanding of the ice age climate. It’s also important for improving the climate database that comes into play when interpreting modern climate records.  One of the researchers involved in the study put it poetically: “The ghost of the Ice Age still hangs over North America.”

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe