New Yorkers Offer Many Happy Returns--of Wallets

The city's reputation to the contrary, a study shows that New York is a good place to get your lost wallet sent back to you.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


March 26, 2007 -- New Yorkers Offer Many Happy Returns—of Wallets

New Yorkers aren’t rude, we’re just in a hurry.  And we’re not dishonest, despite a study done in the ‘90s that found that only 30 percent of pens purposely dropped on New York streets were returned to their owners. 

Because students in an urban studies class at Barnard College recently hypothesized that the low pen return rate might be related to the low value of the lost object.  And that a more valuable item was actually more likely to get returned to its owner.  So they purposely dropped 132 wallets all around the city.  It contained a subway card, four dollars, and cards identifying the owner and an address.  Lo and behold, the wallet was returned to the presumed owner 82 percent of the time.  Three percent of the time it was returned to someone the finder incorrectly assumed to be the owner.  And 13 percent of the time the wallet just laid there not being noticed. 

Which means that only two percent of the time did somebody pocket the wallet, in one of the city’s richest neighborhoods, by the way.  Clearly most New Yorkers know that virtue is its own reward, at least compared to four bucks.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe