Women Really do Prefer Pink

A study has shown that women are more attracted to reddish hues, than to greens, yellows and the universally-loved blues.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


What do women want? According to marketers, anything, as long as it’s pink.
 
From baby blankets to cell phones, the first step in wooing female consumers is to have it pinkwrapped.
 
Well, research published this week in Current Biology might validate the practice, although feminists may see red.
 
Researchers from Newcastle University asked more than 200 people to chose their preferred color from a range of red-green to blue-yellow.

They found that women, across the board, strongly preferred reddish hues, while the men not nearly so much. Further, they gave subjects the Bem Sex Role inventory that measures femininity, and found that the more feminine you are the more you prefer reddish hues.
 
Since the study was cross-cultural, scientists say the preference may be part of our nature. They speculate that in hunter-gatherer days women, who may have gathered more than hunted, honed a skill for spotting red ripe fruit. They also suggest women are more sensitive to blushed skin, in order to better read emotional states.
 
So this sensitivity to reddishness they say, stuck, and may explain the cliché of being pretty in pink.
 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe