Bad Smells and Why They're Good

Researchers have found new details about how we perceive bad odors, and it's a good thing we do. Karen Hopkin reports.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Anyone who’s ever cut up an onion knows that some smells can actually be painful. Now researchers from Baltimore and Denver are closer to understanding why. Scientists used to think that odors that are irritating, like onions and ammonia, directly activate the trigeminal nerve. That nerve responds to touch, temperature and painful stimulation all over the head, and its fibers extend to the membranes that line the inside of the nose.
 
But the current study suggests that the trigeminal nerve doesn’t act alone. Specialized chemosensory cells that line the nasal cavity are actually the first to detect irritating smells. They pass the news to the trigeminal nerve, which then lets your brain know that it’s time to feel the burn. And to tear, or cough, or gag or just generally back off. The findings are described in the March issue of the Journal of Neurophysiology.
 
Having these special sensory cells as a go-between, the scientists say, might make our noses sensitive to a broader variety of irritating odors. That may not seem like such a bonus. But the system probably evolved to protect us, by giving us a heads up when we run into something noxious. It may also keep us from adding too many onions to the spaghetti sauce.

—Karen Hopkin

60-Second Science is a daily podcast. Subscribe to this Podcast: RSS | iTunes

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe