Counterproductive Cameras At Traffic Lights

Researchers in Florida contend that cameras for catching drivers who run red lights actually increase accidents and injuries. Steve Mirsky reports.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Cameras that catch drivers who blow through red lights are there to improve safety, by discouraging light running.  But such cameras actually increase the likelihood of car crashes.  Because more drivers jam on the breaks in an attempt to make a late stop at red-light camera intersections.  That’s the finding of a study done by researchers at the University of South Florida College of Public Health.

They decided to look into the issue because Florida officials are considering installing many more such cameras around the state.  The researchers contend that other studies associating cameras with fewer crashes and injuries are flawed—those studies were linked with the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, an industry group.  But insurers may profit from red light cameras, because revenues go up with increased citations and accidents.

The new report notes that North Carolina, Virginia and Ontario all had increased crash rates and injuries associated with red light cameras.  In Florida, injuries related to red light running are down anyway.  So drivers needing to make a quick decision at a yellow light may be better off not seeing red.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


—Steve Mirsky

60-Second Science is a daily podcast. Subscribe to this Podcast: RSS | iTunes

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe