Worm's Mutation Sheds Light On Lincoln

A genetic mutation in worms that makes their nerve cells brittle helps to explain a physical ailment from which Abe Lincoln, born on this date in 1809, might have suffered.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


February 12, 2007 -- Worm’s Mutation Sheds Light On Lincoln

It’s been one of those days. There’s pressure at work, your place is a mess, your nerves are absolutely shattered. Well, not literally. Unless of course you’re a worm that has no beta spectrin.  Scientists at the University of Utah recently discovered that mutant worms missing a protein called beta spectrin literally fracture their nerve cells when they move. The protein normally acts like a little molecular Slinky, keeping neurons flexible.  And when it’s gone, the nerves can’t bend without breaking.

Aside from being bad news for worms, the finding could have relevance for people. Humans have four beta spectrin genes, and mutations in one of them leads to a debilitating disorder called spinocerebellar ataxia. The disease destroys the nerves responsible for movement, leading to a progressive loss of coordination.  An interesting aside: historians wonder whether Abe Lincoln might have had the condition. His gait was sometimes described as “unsteady,” and a large percentage of his descendants carry the mutant spectrin gene. Incidentally, for those of you who enjoy history and language trivia, the word gene was derived from pangenesis, a word coined by Darwin, who shares a February 12th birthday with Abraham Lincoln.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe