Astronomy's Serendipitious Side

In an article in the journal Science, Tufts University astronomer Kenneth Lang catalogues the discoveries about our universe that were made by happy accident. Karen Hopkin reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


You’ve heard the saying “thank your lucky stars.” Well, in the January 1st issue of Science, astronomer Kenneth Lang of Tufts University says it’s not the stars that are lucky, but the folks who study them. Because some of the biggest discoveries about our universe were stumbled on.

Four hundred years ago, Galileo raised his homemade spyglass to the sky and spotted four of Jupiter’s moons, revealing that other planets could have their own lunar companions. Later, the planet Uranus and the first asteroid, Ceres, were happened on by scientists looking for other things. Again, improved instrumentation led to the finds. Which Lang says is a common occurrence in the world of skygazing.

Gamma ray bursts—those energetic explosions that are thought to herald the death of massive, far-flung stars—were first seen by satellites looking for covert use of nuclear weapons.

And Wilson and Penzias discovered the cosmic microwave background radiation, physical evidence for the Big Bang, while fiddling with an antenna designed to catch radio waves bouncing off satellites. For realizing what they were actually measuring, they got a Nobel Prize. As Yogi Berra, a star himself, once noted, “You can observe a lot just by watching.”

—Karen Hopkin

[The above text is an exact transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe